16/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Guardianship, Parental Rights Acting Judge Van Niekerk, alternative remedies family disputes, best interests child principle, child welfare protection, child-centric legal decisions, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, constitutional children's rights, current evidence requirement, evidentiary threshold family law, family law jurisprudence, forensic evaluation children, guardianship rights suspension, High Court Gauteng Division, legal practitioners guidance, logistical challenges custody, parental cooperation disputes, parental guardianship termination, parental responsibilities termination, passport application disputes, play therapy authorization, procedural delays parental rights, proportionality termination relief, reasonableness standard parental conduct, Section 28 parental rights, South African Family Law, stale evidence family court, temporal relevance custody matters, unopposed family applications When Good Intentions Meet Legal Reality: Y.T.B v J.F.B [2025] ZAGPPHC 494 (16 May 2025) – High Court Rejects Termination of Parental Rights Over Stale Cooperation Complaints. Summary The High Court's decision in Y.T.B v J.F.B represents a significant affirmation of the stringent evidentiary requirements for terminating parental guardianship rights under the Children's Act. The judgment underscores… READ MORE
15/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Birth certificate amendment, Children, Children born outside marriage, DNA testing, Paternity confirmation administrative justice, BADRA, best interests of child, birth certificate amendment, birth registration, Births and Deaths Registration Act, Centre for Child Law, children born outside marriage, children's rights, Constitutional Rights, deportation interdict, dignity rights, DNA testing, family law South Africa, family recognition, High Court paternity, immigration law, legal precedent, maternal consent, PAJA, Parental Rights, paternity confirmation, permanent residence, population register, section 11(5), unmarried fathers, Western Cape High Court DNA Not Required: High Court Rules Fathers Don’t Need Genetic Testing After Paternity Confirmed – V.K and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (21886/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 219 (26 May 2025). The Facts: A Father's Fight for Recognition This case centers on V.K., a Zambian citizen who entered South Africa on a visitor's visa, and his South African partner S.M. The… READ MORE
15/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Children's Court, Costs, Holiday Travel, Parental Rights, Procedure, Reunification, Temporary Safe Care AC Cilliers Law of Costs, best interests principle, biological father access, child access rights, child custody disputes, children's court authority, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Christmas access disputes, costs in family matters, D.G.S.F v M.F case, emotional psychological problems children, family law South Africa, foster care arrangements, Free State High Court, gradual reunification, High Court jurisdiction, leave of absence children, legal costs children matters, magistrate's court jurisdiction, procedural failures, reunification process, section 168 Children's Act, section 187 Children's Act, section 46 Children's Act, social worker reports, temporary safe care, upper guardianship powers, urgent applications, Van Zyl J Father’s Festive Season Bid Fails: High Court Lacks Jurisdiction in Children’s Court Matters – JHG v GWH and Another (7147/2024) [2025] ZAFSHC 133 (7 May 2025). Case Overview: JHG v GWH and Another In the matter of JHG v GWH and Another (7147/2024) ZAFSHC 133 (7 May 2025), the High Court of South Africa, Free State… READ MORE
12/06/2025 Bertus Preller Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Rule 58, Spousal Maintenance, Variation Rule 43(6) Access to Justice, accrual system, banking statements, business interests, close corporation income, costs orders, court discretion, credit facilities, Divorce Act, divorce costs, divorce proceedings, evidence requirements, Family Law, financial disclosure, financial means assessment, High Court Judgment, inadequate disclosure, interlocutory applications, legal contribution, legal costs contribution, legal representation funding, litigation funding, material change circumstances, matrimonial law, matrimonial litigation, patrimonial benefits, Property Valuation, Rule 43 applications, spousal maintenance, uniform rules court Rule 43 Applications Dismissed: Financial Disclosure Failures Sink Litigation Funding Bid in J VW v P C VW (EL 514/2025) [2025] ZAECELLC 8 (27 May 2025). The Facts The parties were involved in a divorce action with patrimonial benefits and the accrual system being central issues. Before the court was an application for a further contribution… READ MORE
10/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Divorce, Guardianship, International Travel, Maintenance, Muslim Marriages, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Relocation best interests of child, child psychology relocation, child relocation South Africa, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, constitutional family law, contact arrangements international, cross-border parenting, custodial parent rights, divorce relocation orders, expert witness family law, F v F constitutional rights, Family Advocate reports, family law South Africa, freedom of movement parents, gender discrimination family law, gender equality family court, international custody disputes, international relocation disputes, Jackson v Jackson precedent, KwaZulu-Natal High Court, maintenance obligations relocation, mirror orders international, non-custodial parent contact, parental alienation allegations, parental consent relocation, passport consent children, Portugal relocation case, primary caregiver rights, visa requirements minors Breaking the Shackles: How W.S v N.V (D376/2020; D1062/2021) [2025] ZAKZDHC 35 (6 June 2025) Transformed South African Child Relocation Law and Gender Rights. The Facts: A Family Torn Between Two Continents This case presents a deeply personal yet legally complex dispute that unfolded over several years, illustrating the profound challenges faced by divorced… READ MORE
28/05/2025 Bertus Preller Arrears, Children, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Islamic Law, Maintenance, Muslim Marriages, Punitive Cost Orders, Rule 43 Acting Judge Van Zyl, attorney client costs, blameworthy conduct, child maintenance, child support enforcement, contempt of court, Contempt Proceedings, curator ad litem, family court orders, family law contempt, family law enforcement, maintenance arrears, maintenance contempt, maintenance default, maintenance defaulters, maintenance enforcement, maintenance obligations, maintenance variation applications, mala fides, periodical imprisonment, punitive costs orders, rental obligations, Rule 43 maintenance, Rule 43 orders, South African Family Law, Suspended Sentence, weekend imprisonment, Western Cape High Court, wilful non-compliance Contempt of Court for Maintenance Default: Weekend Imprisonment and Punitive Costs in S.L v A.C (2024/143281) [2025] ZAWCHC 212 (21 May 2025). Facts The parties were married on 27 April 2009 under Shariah law and have two minor children. Their civil marriage still subsisted, albeit described by Acting Judge Van Zyl as… READ MORE
15/05/2025 Bertus Preller Costs, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Maintenance Claims On Death, Marriage, Surviving Spouse, Wills Administration of Estates Act, deceased estates law, estate administration, estate shortfall, executor duties, executor powers, family law South Africa, financial means assessment, financial self-sufficiency, Free State High Court, interim maintenance, interim maintenance claim, Liquidation and Distribution account, maintenance claim evidence, maintenance claim rejection, maintenance needs proof, Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act, Savvas case, South African inheritance law, surviving spouse maintenance, surviving spouse rights, testamentary freedom, widow's financial position, widow's rights South Africa Financial Self-Sufficiency Defeats Widow’s Maintenance Claim: Savvas v Savvas N.O and Others (1969/2024) [2025] ZAFSHC 115 (7 April 2025). Background: The Maintenance Claim of a Surviving Spouse In the recent judgment of Lynette Savvas v George Michael Savvas N.O and Others (1969/2024) ZAFSHC 115 (7 April 2025), the Free… READ MORE
15/05/2025 Bertus Preller Accomodation, Children, Division of Estate, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Liquidator, Maintenance, Maintenance Court, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance bond payments, bonding therapy, changed circumstances, community of property, divorce proceedings, enforceability of maintenance orders, financial means, High Court Johannesburg, interim maintenance, joint estate, Judge Kumalo, Judicial Discretion, legal costs contribution, matrimonial home, matrimonial property, minor child preferences, pension benefits, reasonable needs, reciprocal duty of support, Rule 43, South African Family Law, spousal support, unemployment, Van Rippen principle When the Well Runs Dry: Court Dismisses Maintenance Claims in H.E.D. v D.D. (2022/14582) [2025] ZAGPJHC 465 (13 May 2025). Background of the Rule 43 Application in H.E.D. v D.D The case of H.E.D. v D.D (2022/14582) ZAGPJHC 465 (13 May 2025) revolves around an application brought under Rule 43… READ MORE
11/05/2025 Bertus Preller Accrual Calculation, Appeal, Commencement Values, Costs, Division of Estate, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Procedure accrual claim, accrual system, Antenuptial Contract, binding agreement, commencement values, conclusive proof, contractual terms, declaration of value, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement, estate calculation, Estate Valuation, financial disclosure, inflation adjustment, legal precedent, marriage contracts, Marriage Dissolution, matrimonial agreements, matrimonial property, Matrimonial Property Act, out of community of property, prima facie proof, property declaration, section 6(3), South African divorce law, South African Law, statutory interpretation, Supreme Court of Appeal, wealth division Understanding the Recent Supreme Court of Appeal Ruling on Antenuptial Contracts On 9 May 2025, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) delivered a landmark judgment in Manelis v Manelis (Case… READ MORE
06/05/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Guardianship, Immigration, International Family Law, International Travel, Relocation, Shared Residency, Views of the Child armed conflict, best interests of child, children's act, constitutional principle, cross-border custody, deportation, expert evidence, family support, gender considerations, geopolitical factors, High Court Johannesburg, immigration status, International Relocation, Israel conflict, Jackson v Jackson, joint parenting, Judicial Discretion, military conscription, neutral approach, Parental Responsibilities, relocation criteria, safety concerns, Section 28 Constitution, Senyatsi J, South African Family Law, T.R.S.T v U.A.R, value-judgment “Best Interests Prevail: Court Rejects Child Relocation to War-Torn Israel in T.R.S.T v U.A.R and Others (019086/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 399 (14 April 2025)”. Introduction to T.R.S.T v U.A.R: A Relocation Application to Israel The recent case of T.R.S.T v U.A.R and Others (019086/2023) ZAGPJHC 399 (14 April 2025) presented the Gauteng Division of… READ MORE