07/11/2026 Bertus Preller Appeal, Article 13(b) grave risk, Automatic Appeals under Section 18(4), Best Interests of the Child, Execution Pending Appeal, Hague Convention Age Limit (Article 4), Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, International Family Law, Protective Measures and Mirror Orders, Stay of execution, Views of the Child Article 13(b), Article 4 Hague Convention, Australia child abduction, best interests of the child, Central Authority South Africa, Chafin v Chafin, child over 16, Children's Act section 10, Children's Act section 7, exceptional circumstances, execution pending appeal, full bench, Hague Convention, Incubeta v Ellis, International Child Abduction, irreparable harm, Knoop v Gupta, Kusevitsky J dissent, Mirror Orders, Protective Measures, reportable judgment, return order, section 18 Superior Courts Act, section 18(4) automatic appeal, Supreme Court of Appeal Practice Directive 1/2024, Tyte Security Services, voice of the child, Western Cape High Court, Wille J A Hague Convention matter is not per se exceptional: when a return order must wait for the appeal. S C v L J H and Another (2026-105403) [2026] ZAWCHC 659 (6 November 2026). This case is about whether a High Court order directing the return of children to Australia under the Hague Convention may be put into operation under section 18(3) of the… READ MORE
13/08/2025 Bertus Preller Abduction, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Guardianship, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Immigration, Relocation, Section 28 Constitution, Unilateral relocation, Views of the Child best interests, child welfare, children's rights, children's act, co-guardianship, conditional consent, consent affidavit, Constitutional Rights, cross-border enforcement, Family Law, guardianship, Hague Convention, international travel, just and equitable relief, Mirror Orders, overseas travel, parental acrimony, parental consent, Parental Responsibilities, passport applications, section 172, section 18, Section 28 Constitution, South African Law, travel disputes, travel documentation, unreasonable refusal, Western Cape High Court When Conditional Consent Becomes Unreasonable Refusal: Parental Rights and Overseas Travel in B.U v C.M and Others (2025/017920) [2025] ZAWCHC 342 (12 August 2025). Factual Background: A Tale of Parental Acrimony and Non-Cooperation The case of B.U v C.M and Others presents a deeply troubling portrait of how parental discord can prejudice a child's… READ MORE
07/08/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adversarial Legal System, Child Bullying, Child protection, Children, Children's Court, Conduct of Childcare Experts, constitutional rights of children, Contempt of Court, Costs, Curator Ad Litem, Emotional Abuse, Family reunification, Grandparents Rights, Guardianship, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Hostile Family Lawyers, Joint Decision Making, Parental Alienation, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Punitive Cost Orders, Reunification, Reunification therapy, Section 28 Constitution, Views of the Child AB-PA, attachment-based parental alienation, Australian parenting orders, best interests of the child, child’s rights, children’s act, co-parenting programs, contempt enforcement, curator ad litem, custody variation, differential diagnosis, emotional abuse, expert evidence, Family Advocate inquiries, forensic psychologist, interim orders, international comparison, legislative reform, multi-disciplinary approach, parental alienation, parenting coordinator, preventive education, psychological assessment, reunification therapy, Rule 43 applications, South African Family Law, supervised contact, therapeutic court orders, UK CAFCASS model, US friendly parent factor Parental Alienation in South African Family Law: Legal Framework, Case Analysis, and Comparative Perspectives. Introduction Parental alienation has emerged as one of the most heart-wrenching dilemmas in South African family law, surfacing with alarming frequency in high-conflict divorces and custody battles. At its core,… READ MORE
06/05/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Guardianship, Immigration, International Family Law, International Travel, Relocation, Shared Residency, Views of the Child armed conflict, best interests of child, children's act, constitutional principle, cross-border custody, deportation, expert evidence, family support, gender considerations, geopolitical factors, High Court Johannesburg, immigration status, International Relocation, Israel conflict, Jackson v Jackson, joint parenting, Judicial Discretion, military conscription, neutral approach, Parental Responsibilities, relocation criteria, safety concerns, Section 28 Constitution, Senyatsi J, South African Family Law, T.R.S.T v U.A.R, value-judgment “Best Interests Prevail: Court Rejects Child Relocation to War-Torn Israel in T.R.S.T v U.A.R and Others (019086/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 399 (14 April 2025)”. Introduction to T.R.S.T v U.A.R: A Relocation Application to Israel The recent case of T.R.S.T v U.A.R and Others (019086/2023) ZAGPJHC 399 (14 April 2025) presented the Gauteng Division of… READ MORE
21/02/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Divorce, Family Law Court System South Africa, Joint Decision Making, Mediation, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Views of the Child Australian family law, bias in PCs, Canadian PCs, child best interests, child welfare, child-centric, co-parenting, Court Orders, dispute resolution, divorce mediation, FAMAC, Family Dispute Resolution Bill, Family Law, financial accessibility, H v H, high-conflict disputes, judicial oversight, Legal Framework, legislative reform, mediation reform, NABFAM, parental conflict, Parental Coordinators, parenting coordination, SALRC, Schneider NO, Section 28(2), South Africa, TC v SC, training PCs Uncharted Guardians: The Rise and Reform of Parental Coordinators in South Africa’s Family Law Frontier. Parental Coordinators in South Africa: Legal Framework and Development Parental Coordinators (PCs) have become an essential mechanism in managing high-conflict parenting disputes in South Africa, particularly after divorce or separation.… READ MORE
14/02/2025 Bertus Preller Abduction, Children, Habitual Residence, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Holiday Travel, International Travel, Views of the Child Article 12 Hague Convention, Article 13(b), best interests of the child, Central Authority of South Africa, child abduction defences, child abduction South Africa, child custody disputes, child protection laws, child return order, curator ad litem, family court judgments, habitual residence, Hague Convention, Hague Convention case law, Hague Convention rulings, Hague Convention South Africa, High Court Johannesburg, international child custody, international custody battles, international family law, international parental disputes, Legal Analysis, legal precedent South Africa, Parental Abduction, parental consent disputes, psychological harm defence, South African child law, South African High Court, wrongful removal Hague Convention Defences Prevail: Court Refuses Child’s Return in Central Authority of South Africa and Another v C.M (2023/077002) [2025] ZAGPJHC 99 (10 February 2025). The Hague Convention and International Child Abduction: A Legal Framework International child abduction cases are among the most complex disputes that courts must resolve, requiring a delicate balance between protecting… READ MORE
20/01/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Curator Ad Litem, Grandparents Rights, Guardianship, International Travel, Relocation, Views of the Child best interests of the child, child welfare, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, children’s rights, co-guardianship, cultural identity, curator ad litem, expert evidence, Family Advocate, family dynamics, family law judgment, financial stability, guardianship, guardianship disputes, high-conflict disputes, JB J v EH B, Judicial Discretion, legal precedent, Legal Representation, LR J and Another case, Parental Responsibilities, Parental Rights, relocation, relocation applications, relocation to Scotland, South African Family Law, stability in family law, supervised contact, supervised reintegration, trust funds Guardianship and Relocation Disputes in Focus: LR J and Another; In Re: JB J v EH B and Others (2024-024281) [2025] ZAGPJHC 11 (14 January 2025. Introduction to the Case: Background and Legal Context The case LR J and Another; In Re: JB J v EH B and Others (2024-024281) ZAGPJHC 11 (14 January 2025) highlights… READ MORE
26/12/2024 Bertus Preller Alienation, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Holiday Travel, International Travel, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Relocation, Views of the Child best interests of the child, child custody relocation South Africa, child psychological impacts relocation, child relocation South Africa, child welfare relocation, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, co-parenting and relocation, F v F, family advocate relocation disputes, family law relocation, Godbeer case, High Court relocation cases, international relocation cases, interprovincial relocation South Africa, Jackson v Jackson, legislative gaps in relocation law, mediation in relocation disputes, parenting plans South Africa, Payne v Payne, relocation disputes South Africa, relocation law reform, shared parental responsibility South Africa, socio-economic factors in relocation, structured relocation checklist, Van Rooyen case Relocation Disputes in South Africa: Balancing the Child’s Best Interests and Parental Rights. Understanding Relocation Disputes and the Best Interests of the Child Relocation disputes arise when a parent wishes to move with a minor child, either within South Africa or internationally, and… READ MORE
12/09/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Alienation, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Divorce, Parental Alienation, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Views of the Child alienating behavior, Child Psychology, child welfare, Child's Best Interests, court intervention, custody disputes, enmeshment, family dynamics, Family Law, legal precedent, parental alienation, psychological assessment, supervised contact, therapeutic intervention Breaking the Cycle: Legal Insights into Parental Alienation in High-Conflict Divorces. Understanding Parental Alienation: Definition and Key Characteristics Parental alienation is a complex psychological phenomenon that can emerge in high-conflict divorce or separation cases, often with devastating consequences for families. It… READ MORE
13/08/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Parental Rights, Procedure, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance, Views of the Child Redefining Rule 43: M.M v R.O (6296/2022) [2024] ZAWCHC 203 Reshapes South African Family Law, (13 August 2024). Background: A Complex Web of Family and Financial Affairs The recent case of M.M v R.O (6296/2022) ZAWCHC 203 (13 August 2024) presents a intricate tapestry of family dynamics, financial… READ MORE