13/09/2025 Bertus Preller Births Deaths Registration Act, Constitutional law, Gender discrimination, Gender equality, Marriage equality, Patriarchal laws, Surname changes, Unfair discrimination Births Deaths Registration Act, Civil Union Act, colonial law legacy, constitutional challenge, Constitutional Court, constitutional law, discrimination analysis, equality jurisprudence, equality rights, family identity choices, Family Law, gender discrimination, Gender Equality, gender-neutral legislation, human dignity, legislative reform, marital naming rights, marriage equality, men's rights, patriarchal laws, reading-in remedy, section 9 Constitution, South African Law, substantive equality, surname changes, suspended declaration invalidity, unfair discrimination, women's rights Constitutional Court Ends Gender-Based Surname Discrimination: Jordaan and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (CCT 296/24) [2025] ZACC 19 (11 September 2025) – Husbands Can Now Take Their Wives’ Surnames. The Factual Matrix: When Husbands Want to Take Their Wives' Surnames The facts giving rise to this landmark constitutional challenge present a stark illustration of how outdated legislation can collide… READ MORE
07/08/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adversarial Legal System, Child Bullying, Child protection, Children, Children's Court, Conduct of Childcare Experts, constitutional rights of children, Contempt of Court, Costs, Curator Ad Litem, Emotional Abuse, Family reunification, Grandparents Rights, Guardianship, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Hostile Family Lawyers, Joint Decision Making, Parental Alienation, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Punitive Cost Orders, Reunification, Reunification therapy, Section 28 Constitution, Views of the Child AB-PA, attachment-based parental alienation, Australian parenting orders, best interests of the child, child’s rights, children’s act, co-parenting programs, contempt enforcement, curator ad litem, custody variation, differential diagnosis, emotional abuse, expert evidence, Family Advocate inquiries, forensic psychologist, interim orders, international comparison, legislative reform, multi-disciplinary approach, parental alienation, parenting coordinator, preventive education, psychological assessment, reunification therapy, Rule 43 applications, South African Family Law, supervised contact, therapeutic court orders, UK CAFCASS model, US friendly parent factor Parental Alienation in South African Family Law: Legal Framework, Case Analysis, and Comparative Perspectives. Introduction Parental alienation has emerged as one of the most heart-wrenching dilemmas in South African family law, surfacing with alarming frequency in high-conflict divorces and custody battles. At its core,… READ MORE
21/02/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Divorce, Family Law Court System South Africa, Joint Decision Making, Mediation, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Views of the Child Australian family law, bias in PCs, Canadian PCs, child best interests, child welfare, child-centric, co-parenting, Court Orders, dispute resolution, divorce mediation, FAMAC, Family Dispute Resolution Bill, Family Law, financial accessibility, H v H, high-conflict disputes, judicial oversight, Legal Framework, legislative reform, mediation reform, NABFAM, parental conflict, Parental Coordinators, parenting coordination, SALRC, Schneider NO, Section 28(2), South Africa, TC v SC, training PCs Uncharted Guardians: The Rise and Reform of Parental Coordinators in South Africa’s Family Law Frontier. Parental Coordinators in South Africa: Legal Framework and Development Parental Coordinators (PCs) have become an essential mechanism in managing high-conflict parenting disputes in South Africa, particularly after divorce or separation.… READ MORE
12/06/2024 Bertus Preller Antenuptial Contracts, Customary Law, Customary Marriages, Marital Regimes 25007/2022, accrual system, Antenuptial Contract, arbitrary deprivation, black women, civil marriage, community of property, constitutional scrutiny, customary marriage, financially weaker spouses, Gender Equality, JRM v VVC and Another, judicial oversight, legislative reform, Matrimonial Property Act, Matrimonial Property Regime, racial equality, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, unfair discrimination Protecting the Vulnerable: JRM v VVC and Another (25007/2022) Exposes the Need for Judicial Oversight in Customary Marriage Property Regimes. The Conundrum: Validity of an 'Antenuptial Contract' Concluded Post-Customary Marriage In the recent case of JRM v VVC and Another (25007/2022), the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria, grappled… READ MORE