Rule 43 Archives - Family Laws South Africa

31/07/2025

Bertus Preller Accomodation, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Procedure, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Rule 58, Variation Rule 43(6) child custody interim, child support interim, contempt of court, custody arrangements, divorce attorneys, divorce legal costs, divorce litigation, divorce mediation, divorce proceedings, divorce South Africa, family court procedures, family law South Africa, Family Lawyers, High Court rules, interim maintenance, interim orders, interim relief applications, Legal Separation, maintenance court, maintenance enforcement, maintenance variation, marital dissolution, matrimonial law, matrimonial relief, Pendente Lite, Rule 43, separation maintenance, spousal maintenance, spousal support, temporary alimony

Rule 43 Explained: The Complete Guide to Interim Divorce Relief and Maintenance in South Africa.

Legal Framework and Purpose of Rule 43 Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules of Court provides an expeditious mechanism for interim relief in matrimonial matters pending the finalisation of a…

29/06/2025

Bertus Preller Family Law Cases May - June 2025 actio communi dividundo, birth registration, Child Custody, Child Relocation, Children’s Court jurisdiction, Co-ownership, customary adoption, customary marriage, divorce rescission, DNA testing, estate administration, family law 2025, familylaws.co.za, financial disclosure, international contempt, June 2025 family law, maintenance enforcement, Matrimonial Property Act, May 2025 SA cases, parental alienation, Plascon‑Evans, preservation order, procedural fairness, property sale order, relocation, Rule 35 discovery, Rule 43, settlement agreement interpretation, shared parental responsibility, South African Family Law, widow maintenance

Shaping the Landscape of Family Law: May–June 2025 South African Case Law Roundup.

Shaping the Landscape of Family Law: May–June 2025 Roundup The months of May and June 2025 featured several high-impact judgments that will influence future family-law disputes—especially on jurisdiction, customary marriage, property rights…

15/05/2025

Bertus Preller Accomodation, Children, Division of Estate, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Liquidator, Maintenance, Maintenance Court, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance bond payments, bonding therapy, changed circumstances, community of property, divorce proceedings, enforceability of maintenance orders, financial means, High Court Johannesburg, interim maintenance, joint estate, Judge Kumalo, Judicial Discretion, legal costs contribution, matrimonial home, matrimonial property, minor child preferences, pension benefits, reasonable needs, reciprocal duty of support, Rule 43, South African Family Law, spousal support, unemployment, Van Rippen principle

When the Well Runs Dry: Court Dismisses Maintenance Claims in H.E.D. v D.D. (2022/14582) [2025] ZAGPJHC 465 (13 May 2025).

Background of the Rule 43 Application in H.E.D. v D.D The case of H.E.D. v D.D (2022/14582) ZAGPJHC 465 (13 May 2025) revolves around an application brought under Rule 43…

25/02/2025

Bertus Preller Customary Law, Customary Marriages, Divorce, Islamic Law, Maintenance, Muslim Marriages, Rule 43, Rule 58, Spousal Maintenance AM v RM case, constitutional family law, custody disputes, Divorce Amendment Act 1 of 2024, divorce case law, divorce legislation, divorce maintenance, divorce proceedings, Essop v Haffejee case, interim relief, Islamic divorce, Islamic law in South Africa, judicial oversight, Legal Jurisdiction, legal precedent, Legal Protections, matrimonial disputes, matrimonial law, Muslim Marriage, Muslim spouses, Muslim women rights, religious divorce, Rule 43, SJ v SE case, South African divorce law, South African Family Law, South African High Court, spousal maintenance, Talaaq, Zaphiriou case

South African Court Rules on Talaaq and Rule 43 Interim Relief in Divorce – H.A v N.A (144907/2024) [2025] ZAGPPHC 121 (13 February 2025).

Introduction: A Landmark Case on Muslim Marriages and Rule 43 The case of H.A v N.A (144907/2024) ZAGPPHC 121 (13 February 2025) addresses a significant legal question concerning the application…

30/01/2025

Bertus Preller Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Procedural Law, Section 7 Matrimonial Properties Act accrual system, acting justice friedman, asset declaration, Asset Disclosure, beneficial ownership, catch-me-if-you-can principle, company assets, constitutional powers, corporate structures, disclosure obligations, divorce litigation, divorce procedure, divorce proceedings, divorce tactics, financial disclosure, financial transparency, Gauteng High Court, High Court Judgment, interlocutory applications, Judicial Discretion, legal precedent, matrimonial law, matrimonial property, Matrimonial Property Act, Practice Directive, Rule 33(4), Rule 43, section 7 notice, separation application, South African Law, Trust assets

Playing Hide and Seek with Assets? High Court Says ‘Game Over!’ – D.M v D.M (2021 043212) [2025] ZAGPJHC 31 (28 January 2025).

The Novel Question: When Must a Spouse Comply with a Section 7 Notice? When it comes to financial disclosure in divorce proceedings, some spouses treat their assets like a magician's…

18/10/2024

Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Best Interests of the Child, Child Maintenance, Children, Cohabitation, Costs, Divorce, International Divorce, Procedural Law, Relocation, Separation Applications child maintenance, cross-border family law, Dubai relocation, enforceability, High Court Judgment, international divorce, jurisdiction, minor children's interests, punitive costs, Rule 33(4), Rule 43, separation of issues, South Africa, Urgent Application

Dubai Dreams vs. Divorce Duties: GK v KK (2015-96997) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1015 (16 October 2024) – Unravels International Family Law Challenges in Separation Applications.

Background: The Complexities of an International Divorce The case of GK v KK (2015-96997) ZAGPPHC 1015 (16 October 2024) highlights the intricate challenges that arise when divorce proceedings intersect with…

03/09/2024

Bertus Preller Children, Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions adverse inferences, child welfare, corporate veil, financial disclosure, high-net-worth, interim maintenance, Legal Costs, luxury lifestyle, maintenance pendente lite, marital standard, property expenses, psoriasis medication, Rule 43, South African divorce, trust law

Rule 43 Showdown: High Court Unravels Luxury Divorce in M.M v T.M (2023/012335) [2024] ZAGPJHC 835. (20 August 2024).

Background: A High-Flying Couple's Messy Divorce In the realm of high-profile divorces, the case of M.M v T.M (2023/012335) ZAGPJHC 835 (20 August 2024) stands out as a particularly complex…

29/08/2024

Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Costs, Maintenance, Procedural Law, Procedure, Rule 43 attorney fees, brevity, case management, court efficiency, divorce proceedings, Family Law, interim relief, Judicial Discretion, judicial rebuke, KwaZulu-Natal High Court, Legal Education, Legal Ethics, Legal Practitioners, matrimonial disputes, Mossop J, procedural abuse, prolixity, Rule 43, South Africa

Judicial Crackdown on Verbose Rule 43 Applications: S.M v N.M (D6667/2024) [2024] ZAKZDHC 54 – (28 August 2024)

The Essence of Rule 43: Brevity and Expediency in Matrimonial Proceedings In the recent High Court judgment of S.M v N.M (D6667/2024) ZAKZDHC 54 (28 August 2024), Judge Mossop delivered…

07/08/2024

Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Hostile Family Lawyers, Maintenance, Procedure, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance aggressive litigation tactics, asset depletion, child welfare, divorce process critique, exorbitant legal fees, financial disclosure, financial hardship, high-conflict divorce, interim relief, judicial case management, Legal Costs, legal reform, maintenance variation, Material change in circumstances, matrimonial property, minor child impact, prolonged litigation, Rule 43, South African Family Law

A Decade of Divorce: L.S v J.S (23967/2012) [2024] ZAGPJHC 653 Exposes Flaws in South African Family Law (2 August 2024).

Background: A 12-Year Divorce Battle Reaches New Heights The case of L.S v J.S (23967/2012) ZAGPJHC 653 (2 August 2024) presents a stark illustration of the perils of prolonged divorce…

31/07/2024

Bertus Preller Actio communi dividundo, Adversarial Legal System, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Costs, Divorce, Hostile Family Lawyers, Marital Regimes, Rule 43 actio communi dividundo, best interests of the child, children's interests, costs order, divorce proceedings, equity, family disputes, Family Law, Gauteng Division, High Court, joint ownership, legal precedent, litigation conduct, matrimonial home, Property Division, property rights, punitive costs, Robson v Theron, Rule 43, scale B costs, South African Law, transfer of property, valuation

Dividing the Family Home and Awarding Costs: N M v M M and Another (2023/008561) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1818 Balances Property Rights, Children’s Interests, and Litigation Conduct.

The Actio Communi Dividundo: Terminating Joint Ownership During Divorce Proceedings In the recent case of N M v M M and Another (2023/008561) ZAGPJHC 1818 (24 July 2024), the Gauteng…

Tag: Rule 43