01/11/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Interlocutory applications, Motion proceedings, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Plascon Evans Rule, Procedural Law, Procedure, Referral to trial, Rule 6(5)(g), Sexual Abuse, Sexual Abuse Allegations abuse of process, child contact disputes, Children's Best Interests, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, coaching of child, court as upper guardian, credibility assessment, custody and access, Dispute of Fact, expert evidence family law, expert witness requirements, family advocate report, forensic psychologist report, interlocutory applications, judicial investigation children, motion proceedings, onus of proof family law, Parental Rights, Plascon-Evans rule, referral to trial, room hire principle, Rule 6(5)(g), section 28 best interests, sexual abuse allegations, shared parenting arrangements, South African Family Law, supervised contact, suspension of contact rights, unsubstantiated allegations Unproven Abuse Allegations and Expert Evidence: When Courts Reject Referral to Trial in Child Contact Disputes – C.N v I.G.R (D6383/2024) [2025] ZAKZDHC 68 (28 October 2025). The Factual Matrix: Allegations of Sexual Abuse and Protracted Litigation The case of C.N v I.G.R (D6383/2024) ZAKZDHC 68 (28 October 2025) presents a troubling factual scenario that will resonate… READ MORE
07/08/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adversarial Legal System, Child Bullying, Child protection, Children, Children's Court, Conduct of Childcare Experts, constitutional rights of children, Contempt of Court, Costs, Curator Ad Litem, Emotional Abuse, Family reunification, Grandparents Rights, Guardianship, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Hostile Family Lawyers, Joint Decision Making, Parental Alienation, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Punitive Cost Orders, Reunification, Reunification therapy, Section 28 Constitution, Views of the Child AB-PA, attachment-based parental alienation, Australian parenting orders, best interests of the child, child’s rights, children’s act, co-parenting programs, contempt enforcement, curator ad litem, custody variation, differential diagnosis, emotional abuse, expert evidence, Family Advocate inquiries, forensic psychologist, interim orders, international comparison, legislative reform, multi-disciplinary approach, parental alienation, parenting coordinator, preventive education, psychological assessment, reunification therapy, Rule 43 applications, South African Family Law, supervised contact, therapeutic court orders, UK CAFCASS model, US friendly parent factor Parental Alienation in South African Family Law: Legal Framework, Case Analysis, and Comparative Perspectives. Introduction Parental alienation has emerged as one of the most heart-wrenching dilemmas in South African family law, surfacing with alarming frequency in high-conflict divorces and custody battles. At its core,… READ MORE
13/07/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Child protection, Children, Children's Court, Conduct of Childcare Experts, constitutional rights of children, Family reunification, Foster care, Grandparents Rights, Kinship care, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Section 28 Constitution 4 July 2025, best interests of the child South Africa, Cape Town High Court, care and contact orders, child custody South Africa, child protection, child removal South Africa, child witness protection, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Children’s Court appeal, constitutional rights of children, Dr Astrid Martalas, ex parte court orders, family law South Africa, family reunification judgment, foster care legal challenge, High Court appeal 2025, kinship care, legal precedent family law, legal safeguards in child care, Magistrate Sipoyo judgment, no-contact order South Africa, Parental Rights, procedural fairness South Africa, psychological harm attachment, Rule of Law family matters, S.E.T and Others v Department of Justice, Section 28 Constitution, ZAWCHC 282 “Torn Apart Without Cause”: High Court Slams Children’s Court in S.E.T and Others v Department of Justice and Another (A83/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 282 (4 July 2025). The Factual Matrix: Arrests, Allegations and the Path to Atlantis Court This matter originated in deeply troubling circumstances involving two minor children, a six-year-old girl (X) and a one-year-old boy… READ MORE
10/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Divorce, Guardianship, International Travel, Maintenance, Muslim Marriages, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Relocation best interests of child, child psychology relocation, child relocation South Africa, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, constitutional family law, contact arrangements international, cross-border parenting, custodial parent rights, divorce relocation orders, expert witness family law, F v F constitutional rights, Family Advocate reports, family law South Africa, freedom of movement parents, gender discrimination family law, gender equality family court, international custody disputes, international relocation disputes, Jackson v Jackson precedent, KwaZulu-Natal High Court, maintenance obligations relocation, mirror orders international, non-custodial parent contact, parental alienation allegations, parental consent relocation, passport consent children, Portugal relocation case, primary caregiver rights, visa requirements minors Breaking the Shackles: How W.S v N.V (D376/2020; D1062/2021) [2025] ZAKZDHC 35 (6 June 2025) Transformed South African Child Relocation Law and Gender Rights. The Facts: A Family Torn Between Two Continents This case presents a deeply personal yet legally complex dispute that unfolded over several years, illustrating the profound challenges faced by divorced… READ MORE
17/03/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Costs, Guardianship, Relocation 2025 ZAKZPHC 26, best interests of the child, Child Relocation, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, consent order rejection, Contact rights, court discretion, custody dispute, D.R.R v S.D.R, expert evidence, F v F, Family Advocate, Family Law, High Court South Africa, Johannesburg vs Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Division, legal precedent, Mossop J, parental alienation, Parental Rights, primary care, psychological reports, sibling separation, sibling unity, South African Law, Terblanche v Terblanche, upper guardian, Van der Linde case, ZDE v CE Divided No More: Sibling Unity Triumphs in D.R.R v S.D.R and Another (8947/2022P) [2025] ZAKZPHC 26 (13 March 2025). Background of the Family Dispute In the matter of D.R.R v S.D.R and Another (8947/2022P) ZAKZPHC 26 (13 March 2025), heard in the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Division,… READ MORE
26/12/2024 Bertus Preller Alienation, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Holiday Travel, International Travel, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Relocation, Views of the Child best interests of the child, child custody relocation South Africa, child psychological impacts relocation, child relocation South Africa, child welfare relocation, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, co-parenting and relocation, F v F, family advocate relocation disputes, family law relocation, Godbeer case, High Court relocation cases, international relocation cases, interprovincial relocation South Africa, Jackson v Jackson, legislative gaps in relocation law, mediation in relocation disputes, parenting plans South Africa, Payne v Payne, relocation disputes South Africa, relocation law reform, shared parental responsibility South Africa, socio-economic factors in relocation, structured relocation checklist, Van Rooyen case Relocation Disputes in South Africa: Balancing the Child’s Best Interests and Parental Rights. Understanding Relocation Disputes and the Best Interests of the Child Relocation disputes arise when a parent wishes to move with a minor child, either within South Africa or internationally, and… READ MORE
19/11/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Appeal, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Coercive Control, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Costs, Divorce, Family Law Court System South Africa, In Community of Property, Marital Regimes, Pacta sunt servanda, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Punitive Cost Orders, Relocation, Settlement agreements, Shared Residency best interests of child, breastfeeding rights, Child Custody, children's rights, children's act, Constitutional Rights, costs order, custody agreement, custody battle, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement, Family Advocate, family advocate recommendations, Family Court, Family Law, financial coercion, joint estate, Judicial Discretion, legal precedent, matrimonial property, Medupi Power Station, Parental Rights, parenting plan, Primary Caregiver, primary residence, settlement agreement, South African courts, Supreme Court of Appeal, unilateral relocation, upper guardian When Power Moves Meet Parental Rights: High Court Pulls the Plug on Dad’s Custody Settlement in ZDE v CE (1011/2022) [2024] ZASCA 159. (18 November 2024). Background to the Matter Picture this: the corridors of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein, where legal dramas unfold with the regularity of load-shedding schedules. But this time, the… READ MORE
01/06/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Guardianship, Parental Rights, Relocation, Views of the Child best interests of the child, child development, Child Relocation, child's views, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, clinical psychologist, co-parenting, competing interests, counselling psychologist, emotional well-being, expert evidence, Family Law, landmark decision, meaningful relationship, non-relocating parent, Parental Rights, parenting plan, reasonableness of relocation, relocating parent, relocation application, relocation assessment, relocation dispute, relocation factors, relocation hearing, relocation judgment, relocation order, section 28(2) Constitution, shared parenting, urgent relief V.L v F.N (4760/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 146 (30 May 2024) – A Court Decision in Family Law on Child Relocation. Introduction In the recent case of V.L v F.N (4760/2024) ZAWCHC 146, delivered on 30 May 2024, the Western Cape High Court was faced with a complex and emotionally charged… READ MORE
30/04/2024 Bertus Preller Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts abuse of process, child care cases, Children’s Court, conflicts of interest, counselling psychologist, Dickinson v Fisher's Executors 1914 AD 424, disciplinary inquiries, disciplinary proceedings, disciplinary sanctions, Els v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (965/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 112, ethical violations, exploitation, facilitator, HPCSA, interlocutory appeal, mental health professionals, multiple relationships, piecemeal appeals, power imbalance, professional boundaries, professional ethics, professional misconduct, Regulation 11, Stalingrad tactics, therapeutic relationship, therapeutic services, unprofessional conduct, vulnerable clients, Wahlhaus principle, Zuma v Downer 2024 (2) SA 356 (SCA) Crossing Boundaries: The Perils of Multiple Relationships in Child Care Cases – Els v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (965/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 112 (25 April 2024) Introduction The Western Cape High Court recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of Els v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (965/2023) ZAWCHC 112 (25 April… READ MORE