Paternity confirmation Archives - Family Laws South Africa

22/11/2025

Bertus Preller Balance of probabilities, Children, Court-ordered DNA testing, DNA evidence admissibility, DNA testing, Documentary evidence principles, Expert evidence requirements, Genetic testing reliability, Paternity confirmation, Paternity Disputes, Paternity Fraud, Paternity presumptions, Probative value of documents, SANAS guidelines, Scientific certainty standards authenticity of documents, balance of probabilities, buttressing oral evidence, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Civil Proceedings Evidence Act 25 of 1965, contemporaneous documentary evidence, court-ordered DNA testing, cross-examination requirements, cumulative evidence assessment, DNA evidence admissibility, documentary evidence principles, evidence law principles, expert evidence requirements, expert opinion evidence, family law South Africa, genetic testing reliability, Maintenance Act 99 of 1998, maintenance court proceedings, maintenance enquiries, Mayer v Williams, paternity disputes, paternity presumptions, prima facie evidence, probative value of documents, SANAS guidelines, scientific certainty standards, unrepresented litigants, viva voce testimony, Western Cape High Court

When DNA Evidence Speaks Without Experts: Probabilities, Paternity and Documentary Evidence in E.A.P v S.W (A115/2025) [2025] ZAWCHC 540 (20 November 2025).

Factual Background: A Protracted Paternity Dispute Spanning Two Decades This appeal concerned a finding by the Cape Town Magistrate's Court, sitting as a maintenance court, that the appellant was the…

27/07/2025

Bertus Preller Artificial fertilisation, Artificial insemination, Children, Children's Court, Gamete donation, Gamete donor agreement, IVF disputes, Parental Rights, Paternity confirmation, Section 40(3) Children's Act, Sperm donor, Surrogacy artificial fertilisation, artificial insemination, AV v DC case, best interests of children, biological father, child support, child welfare, children's rights, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, declaratory relief, discretionary relief, Family Law, gamete donation, gamete donor agreement, intimate relationships, IVF disputes, maintenance obligations, paramountcy principle, Parental Duties, Parental Responsibilities, paternal rights, QG v CS case, reproductive law, reproductive technology, Section 40(3) Children's Act, sperm donor, Superior Courts Act, upper guardian, Von Ludwig AJ

When Sperm Donation Meets Parental Duty: V.R.N v B.L.S (2024/058240) [2025] ZAGPJHC 701 (18 July 2025) – Court Rejects Biological Father’s Escape from Responsibility.

The Facts: When Romantic Relationships Complicate Gamete Donation Arrangements The factual matrix in this case illustrates precisely why clear, formal agreements are essential in artificial fertilisation arrangements, particularly where the…

DNA Not Required: High Court Rules Fathers Don’t Need Genetic Testing After Paternity Confirmed – V.K and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (21886/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 219 (26 May 2025).

The Facts: A Father's Fight for Recognition This case centers on V.K., a Zambian citizen who entered South Africa on a visitor's visa, and his South African partner S.M. The…

Category: Paternity confirmation