07/11/2026 Bertus Preller Appeal, Article 13(b) grave risk, Automatic Appeals under Section 18(4), Best Interests of the Child, Execution Pending Appeal, Hague Convention Age Limit (Article 4), Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, International Family Law, Protective Measures and Mirror Orders, Stay of execution, Views of the Child Article 13(b), Article 4 Hague Convention, Australia child abduction, best interests of the child, Central Authority South Africa, Chafin v Chafin, child over 16, Children's Act section 10, Children's Act section 7, exceptional circumstances, execution pending appeal, full bench, Hague Convention, Incubeta v Ellis, International Child Abduction, irreparable harm, Knoop v Gupta, Kusevitsky J dissent, Mirror Orders, Protective Measures, reportable judgment, return order, section 18 Superior Courts Act, section 18(4) automatic appeal, Supreme Court of Appeal Practice Directive 1/2024, Tyte Security Services, voice of the child, Western Cape High Court, Wille J A Hague Convention matter is not per se exceptional: when a return order must wait for the appeal. S C v L J H and Another (2026-105403) [2026] ZAWCHC 659 (6 November 2026). This case is about whether a High Court order directing the return of children to Australia under the Hague Convention may be put into operation under section 18(3) of the… READ MORE
24/06/2025 Bertus Preller Abduction, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Contempt of Court, Costs, Habitual Residence, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Holiday Travel, Immigration, International Divorce, International Family Law, International Travel, Joint Decision Making, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Punitive Cost Orders, Relocation attorney and client scale, best interests of children, care and contact assessment, child abduction, child custody orders, contempt of court, contempt proceedings urgency, cross-border custody disputes, cross-border litigation, divorce proceedings, Easter holiday dispute, emergency passports, family court jurisdiction, Hague Convention, hearsay evidence, international child retention, international enforcement, judicial authority vindication, Jurisdictional Challenges, mala fides presumption, postponement applications, punitive costs, sine die postponement, South African Family Law, suspended imprisonment, Swiss courts, travel documentation, Western Cape High Court, wilful non-compliance When Easter Holidays Turn Into International Child Retention: T.A.M-W v C.M.M (2025/030666) [2025] ZAWCHC 217 (23 May 2025) and the Limits of Cross-Border Contempt Orders. Key Takeaways This landmark judgment demonstrates that South African courts will not hesitate to use their full arsenal of sanctions when parties deliberately flout agreed court orders, particularly where children's… READ MORE
06/05/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Guardianship, Immigration, International Family Law, International Travel, Relocation, Shared Residency, Views of the Child armed conflict, best interests of child, children's act, constitutional principle, cross-border custody, deportation, expert evidence, family support, gender considerations, geopolitical factors, High Court Johannesburg, immigration status, International Relocation, Israel conflict, Jackson v Jackson, joint parenting, Judicial Discretion, military conscription, neutral approach, Parental Responsibilities, relocation criteria, safety concerns, Section 28 Constitution, Senyatsi J, South African Family Law, T.R.S.T v U.A.R, value-judgment “Best Interests Prevail: Court Rejects Child Relocation to War-Torn Israel in T.R.S.T v U.A.R and Others (019086/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 399 (14 April 2025)”. Introduction to T.R.S.T v U.A.R: A Relocation Application to Israel The recent case of T.R.S.T v U.A.R and Others (019086/2023) ZAGPJHC 399 (14 April 2025) presented the Gauteng Division of… READ MORE
26/12/2024 Bertus Preller Abduction, Adoption, Alienation, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Guardianship, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, International Family Law, International Travel Australian family law, best interests of the child, child abduction, Child Custody, Child Relocation, child welfare, child’s views in family law, children’s act, comparative law, cross-border family disputes, Custody Battles, English family law, Family Advocate, Family Law, family law frameworks, family law reform, family mediation, Fletcher v Fletcher, French family law, Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, joint parental responsibility, legal aid in family law, parental authority, parental responsibility, Parental Rights, relocation disputes, relocation with children, sibling unity, South African Family Law Comparative Analysis: South African, English, Australian, and French Law on Parental Responsibility, Relocation, and Child Abduction. Parental Responsibility South Africa: Governed by Chapter 3 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, parental responsibilities and rights include care, contact, guardianship, and maintenance. These responsibilities are automatic for… READ MORE