13/09/2026 Bertus Preller Appeal, Appealability, Civil procedure., Condemnation application, Default judgment., Divorce, Divorce settlement agreement, Leave to appeal Superior Courts Act, Nullity of divorce order, Procedure, Recission, Separation of issues, Settlement agreements accrual claims, appealability, B v B, B v B 2026 ZASCA 115, civil procedure, condonation application, default judgment, Divorce Decree, divorce settlement agreement, final court order, functus officio, jurisdiction, lapsed appeal, matrimonial litigation, Matrimonial Property Act, nullity of court order, procedural fairness, prospects of success, reinstatement of appeal, rescission of judgment, Rule 33(4), Rule 42(1)(a), separation of issues, settlement agreement, South African divorce law, special leave to appeal, Superior Courts Act, Supreme Court of Appeal, Zweni test Crossing the Rule 33(4) Line: When a Divorce Order Becomes a Nullity in B[…] v B[…] (562/2025) [2026] ZASCA 115 (7 September 2026). The Facts and Procedural History: From Settlement Agreement to a Lapsed Appeal The litigation in B v B (562/2025) ZASCA 115 (7 September 2026) arose from a divorce that became… READ MORE
26/10/2025 Bertus Preller Accrual claims, Divorce, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, Member spouse, Non-member spouse, Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956, Pension interest, Procedural Law, Procedure, Referee report, Retirement fund divorce, Section 37D, Settlement agreements, Tax liability pension interest accrual claims, accrual system, C.N.N v N.N, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, divorce settlement agreement, divorce trial court, legislative lacuna pension law, matrimonial property, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, member spouse, motion court jurisdiction, Ndaba v Ndaba, non-member spouse, Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956, pension funds legislation, pension interest, pension sharing divorce, referee report, retirement benefits divorce, retirement fund divorce, Reynolds v Reynolds, section 3 Matrimonial Property Act, section 37D, section 7(8), South African Family Law, T.M.W v J.J.W, tax liability pension interest, withdrawal benefits tax, ZAGPPHC 1093 2025 When Retirement Funds Cannot Settle Accrual Claims: D E C B v J M B (37464-2020) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1093 (21 October 2025) and the Jurisdictional Dilemma in South African Divorce Law. Factual Matrix: When a Referee's Report Reveals More Questions Than Answers The parties in this matter were married out of community of property with the application of the accrual system… READ MORE
14/08/2025 Bertus Preller Divorce order enforcement, Divorce settlement defects, Litis contestatio, Procedure, Rescission applications, Rescission applications, Settlement agreement interpretation, Settlement agreement variation, Settlement agreements, Urgency, Urgent applications, Validity Divorce Settlement Agreement Alienation of Land Act, bond approval, breach letters, Case Law Analysis, Co-ownership, Consent Papers, conveyancing, divorce order enforcement, estate agents, Family Law, forum selection, High Court jurisdiction, judicial comity, litis contestatio, marital property disputes, matrimonial property, Powers of Attorney, property transfer disputes, Regional Court jurisdiction, rescission applications, Rule 6(12), sale agreements, sectional title, Self-Created Urgency, South African property law, urgent applications, urgent motion proceedings, void ab initio, Western Cape High Court Self-Created Urgency and Invalid Property Agreements: Key Lessons from SPR v NV (2025/119985) [2025] ZAWCHC 346 (13 August 2025). Factual Matrix: Divorce Order Enforcement and Property Transfer Disputes The matter concerned the enforcement of a Regional Court divorce order incorporating a consent paper, where former spouses held immovable property… READ MORE
20/07/2025 Bertus Preller Caveat Subscriptor, Contractual repudiation, Divorce, Pacta sunt servanda, Procedural Law, Recission of Divorce Orders, Settlement agreement finality, Settlement agreements, Validity Divorce Settlement Agreement Auckland Park case, caveat subscriptor, child maintenance, contractual interpretation, contractual repudiation, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, Divorce Decree, divorce litigation, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement agreement, family law practice, George v Fairmead, High Court Gauteng, Legal Representation, maintenance agreements, matrimonial property, Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund, Pacta Sunt Servanda, Parental Rights, post-signature regret, property forfeiture, settlement agreement validity, settlement negotiations, South African Family Law, spousal maintenance, undue influence, Van der Schyff J, vitiating factors, witness attestation Caveat Subscriptor Strikes Again: When Post-Signature Regret Meets Divorce Reality in O.M.L v S.S.L (10528/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 712 (16 July 2025). The Factual Matrix: When Signatures Tell a Different Story The factual backdrop of this matter presents a curious tale of matrimonial dissolution that would make any family law practitioner pause.… READ MORE
02/07/2025 Bertus Preller Divorce, Divorce settlement defects, Liquidator, Procedural Law, Receiver Divorce, Recission of Divorce Orders, Settlement agreement finality, Settlement agreement interpretation, Settlement agreement variation, Settlement agreements Children's Best Interests, children's inheritance rights, community of property marriages, condonation applications, debt-free property preservation, Divorce Act section 7(8), divorce aftermath litigation, divorce settlement defects, joint estate liquidation, legal representation duties, liquidator appointment applications, matrimonial home disputes, matrimonial property trust, motion proceedings evidence, pension benefits accrual, pension fund entitlements, pension interest claims, Plascon-Evans rule, post-divorce disputes, property occupation disputes, res judicata principles, Rule 42 variation applications, settlement agreement finality, settlement agreement variation, trust beneficiaries protection, trust registration requirements, trustee appointment orders, unrepresented parties divorce Six Years Later: Defective Settlement Clause Triggers Failed Liquidation Bid in PLB v LRB (36798/2014) [2025] ZAGPPHC 600 – 4 June 2025. The Facts: A Matrimonial Home Dispute Six Years After Divorce This case concerned a post-divorce dispute that arose six years after the dissolution of marriage between PLB and LRB, who… READ MORE
28/06/2025 Bertus Preller Appeal, Contractual repudiation, Deleted clauses contract interpretation, Divorce, Settlement agreement finality, Settlement agreement interpretation, Settlement agreements breach of settlement agreement, close corporation disputes, commercial dispute resolution, commercial entities matrimonial law, commercial relationship breakdown, contract amendment principles, contract cancellation principles, contract cancellation procedures, contractual breach remedies, contractual interpretation principles, contractual obligations enforcement, contractual repudiation remedies, contractual repudiation South Africa, deleted clauses contract interpretation, handwritten contract amendments, Limpopo High Court, matrimonial commercial entities, matrimonial litigation appeals, matrimonial property settlements, matrimonial settlement disputes, matrimonial settlement law, mora contractual obligations, repudiation contract law, settlement agreement breach, settlement agreement cancellation, settlement agreement enforcement, settlement agreement interpretation, settlement agreement validity High Court Upholds Settlement Cancellation: J.V.S v M.V.S and Others [2025] ZALMPPHC 101 (19 May 2025) – When Deleted Clauses Still Bind. The Factual Matrix: From Matrimonial Breakdown to Settlement Agreement Disputes This complex matrimonial dispute arose from the breakdown of a marriage between the appellant and first respondent, leading to protracted… READ MORE
28/06/2025 Bertus Preller Actio communi dividundo, Appeal, Clean Break Principle, Cohabitation, Divorce, Settlement agreement finality, Settlement agreements actio communi dividundo, alternative access arrangements, clean break principle, contractual interpretation family law, contractual occupation rights, court order variation requirements, deed of settlement breach, domestic violence protection orders, Eastern Cape High Court, Endumeni interpretation principles, factual disputes motion proceedings, finality principle settlement agreements, joint property ownership disputes, matrimonial property arrangements, motion court proceedings, occupation rights conditions, Plascon-Evans principle, post-divorce litigation, post-divorce property disputes, property sale compelling orders, Regional Court appeal, romantic partner cohabitation clause, settlement agreement finality, settlement agreement interpretation Settlement Agreement Interpretation Triumph: J.G.C v G.A.C [2025] ZAECMKHC 44 (13 May 2025) – High Court Overturns Property Sale Order. The Factual Matrix: What Led to the Appeal This appeal arose from a bitter post-divorce property dispute between former spouses who had been married for thirty-five years in community of… READ MORE
19/12/2024 Bertus Preller Costs, Divorce, Procedure, Recission of Divorce Orders, Settlement agreements condonation applications, consent agreement, consent paper validity, Consent Papers, consent validity, Court Jurisdiction, court order rescission, Court Procedures, divorce consent requirements, divorce law south africa, divorce order challenges, divorce order variation, divorce proceedings, divorce rights, divorce settlements, financial pressure divorce, High Court Judgment, legal consent, legal precedent, legal representation divorce, mapongwana aj, Marriage Dissolution, mental health divorce, rescission of court orders, rule 42 applications, rule 42 uniform rules, South African Family Law, undue influence divorce, Western Cape High Court No Easy Path to Rescind Divorce Orders: Western Cape High Court’s Ruling in MMS v LES (5910/2019) [2024] ZAWCHC (19 December 2024). Court Finds No Grounds for Rescission of Divorce Order Despite Claims of Undue Influence In an important judgment delivered by Acting Judge Mapongwana in the Western Cape Division of the… READ MORE
19/11/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Appeal, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Coercive Control, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Costs, Divorce, Family Law Court System South Africa, In Community of Property, Marital Regimes, Pacta sunt servanda, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Punitive Cost Orders, Relocation, Settlement agreements, Shared Residency best interests of child, breastfeeding rights, Child Custody, children's rights, children's act, Constitutional Rights, costs order, custody agreement, custody battle, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement, Family Advocate, family advocate recommendations, Family Court, Family Law, financial coercion, joint estate, Judicial Discretion, legal precedent, matrimonial property, Medupi Power Station, Parental Rights, parenting plan, Primary Caregiver, primary residence, settlement agreement, South African courts, Supreme Court of Appeal, unilateral relocation, upper guardian When Power Moves Meet Parental Rights: High Court Pulls the Plug on Dad’s Custody Settlement in ZDE v CE (1011/2022) [2024] ZASCA 159. (18 November 2024). Background to the Matter Picture this: the corridors of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein, where legal dramas unfold with the regularity of load-shedding schedules. But this time, the… READ MORE
01/11/2024 Bertus Preller Contempt of Court, Costs, Divorce, Hiding Assets, International Divorce, Procedure, Settlement agreements asset distribution, civil debt, civil imprisonment, civil procedure, constitutional law, contempt of court, court authority, Court Orders, cross-border enforcement, debt enforcement, Divorce Act, divorce litigation, divorce settlement, doctrine of effectiveness, emigration consequences, foreign jurisdiction, international debtor, international divorce, international enforcement, jurisdiction, Justice Wille, Legal Jurisdiction, maintenance arrears, maintenance obligations, matrimonial property, monetary judgments, nulla bona, Saudi Arabia, South African Law, Western Cape High Court From Cape Town to Saudi: Why Your Ex Can’t Be Jailed Abroad – V.L v O.C.V (11677/2006 ; 18206/2007) [2024] ZAWCHC 338 (29 October 2024). Background: A 17-Year-Old Divorce Settlement Gone Wrong Picture this: A divorce settlement from 2006, a respondent who jetted off to Saudi Arabia, and an ex-spouse wielding a court order like… READ MORE