12/08/2025 Bertus Preller Divorce, Divorce Act section 9, Forfeiture of Benefits, Forfeiture patrimonial benefits, Gambling addiction, Marital misconduct, Substantial misconduct, Undue benefit test business failure, casino gambling, Child Custody, community of property, divorce act section 9, divorce costs, divorce proceedings, Engelbrecht judgment, estate liquidation, Family Law, financial misconduct, forfeiture patrimonial benefits, gambling addiction, joint estate division, legal precedent, Marital Assets, marital misconduct, marriage breakdown, Matrimonial Property Regime, Parental Rights, property forfeiture, property investment, receiver and liquidator, rental income, spousal contributions, substantial misconduct, undue benefit test, Western Cape High Court, Wijker case Gambling Addiction vs Substantial Misconduct: When Forfeiture Claims Fail in Community of Property Divorces – P.N v D.N (10481/2018) [2025] ZAWCHC 335 (6 August 2025). Factual Matrix: A 20-Year Marriage Marred by Allegations of Compulsive Gambling The matter before Kholong AJ in the Western Cape Division concerned the dissolution of a marriage that had endured… READ MORE
23/07/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adultery, Division of Estate, Divorce, Divorce Statistics, Domestic Violence, Forfeiture of Benefits, Infidelity, Marriage accrual, adultery, Andy Byron, Asset Division, assets, B.R.B.M v R.K.B.M, C.M.M v A.M.S.M, community of property, Divorce Act, Divorce Law, Family Court, family law attorney, forfeiture, forfeiture orders, High Court, legal commentary, legal precedent, M v M, marital breakdown, Matyila v Matyila, misconduct, no-fault divorce, patrimonial benefits, public infidelity, section 9(1), South Africa, T.N v S.N, undue benefit, Wijker v Wijker Andy Byron Scandal: Public Infidelity and the Forfeiture of Assets under Section 9(1) of the Divorce Act in South Africa. South African divorce law permits courts to depart from the usual 50/50 division of marital assets in order to prevent an undeserved windfall to a spouse who caused or contributed… READ MORE
15/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Birth certificate amendment, Children, Children born outside marriage, DNA testing, Paternity confirmation administrative justice, BADRA, best interests of child, birth certificate amendment, birth registration, Births and Deaths Registration Act, Centre for Child Law, children born outside marriage, children's rights, Constitutional Rights, deportation interdict, dignity rights, DNA testing, family law South Africa, family recognition, High Court paternity, immigration law, legal precedent, maternal consent, PAJA, Parental Rights, paternity confirmation, permanent residence, population register, section 11(5), unmarried fathers, Western Cape High Court DNA Not Required: High Court Rules Fathers Don’t Need Genetic Testing After Paternity Confirmed – V.K and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (21886/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 219 (26 May 2025). The Facts: A Father's Fight for Recognition This case centers on V.K., a Zambian citizen who entered South Africa on a visitor's visa, and his South African partner S.M. The… READ MORE
11/05/2025 Bertus Preller Accrual Calculation, Appeal, Commencement Values, Costs, Division of Estate, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Procedure accrual claim, accrual system, Antenuptial Contract, binding agreement, commencement values, conclusive proof, contractual terms, declaration of value, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement, estate calculation, Estate Valuation, financial disclosure, inflation adjustment, legal precedent, marriage contracts, Marriage Dissolution, matrimonial agreements, matrimonial property, Matrimonial Property Act, out of community of property, prima facie proof, property declaration, section 6(3), South African divorce law, South African Law, statutory interpretation, Supreme Court of Appeal, wealth division D.C.M v C.C.M (1235/22) [2025] ZASCA 55 (9 May 2025). Understanding the Recent Supreme Court of Appeal Ruling on Antenuptial Contracts On 9 May 2025, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) delivered a landmark judgment in Manelis v Manelis (Case… READ MORE
21/04/2025 Bertus Preller Division of Estate, Divorce, Forfeiture of Benefits, Pension Funds, Recission of Divorce Orders community of property, court discretion, divorce act section 9, divorce costs, divorce judgment, divorce proceedings, divorce settlements, extramarital affairs, family law South Africa, financial abuse marriage, financial misconduct, Forfeiture of benefits, Gauteng High Court, High Court Judgment, justice kooverjie, legal precedent, Marital Assets, marriage breakdown, matrimonial property, partial rescission, pension claims, Pension Forfeiture, pension interests divorce, Property Division, South African divorce law, spousal misconduct, substantial misconduct, undue benefit, wijker test Marriage Misconduct Costs Husband Dearly: Court Orders Forfeiture of Property and Pension Benefits in M.J.L v L.O.L (22341/19; A288/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 331 (27 March 2025). Background: The Marriage and Subsequent Divorce Proceedings The recent High Court judgment in M.J.L v L.O.L (22341/19; A288/2023) ZAGPPHC 331 (27 March 2025) provides valuable insights into how South African… READ MORE
09/04/2025 Bertus Preller Alimony, Costs, Divorce, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions accrual system, Acting Judge Pretorius, constitutional rights in divorce, contribution to legal costs, Divorce Litigation Costs, divorce proceedings, duty of support, equality before the law, Equality of Arms, expert fees in divorce, Family Law, financial disclosure, financial non-disclosure, financial transparency, forensic accounting, Gauteng High Court, high net worth divorce, interim maintenance, legal precedent, maintenance pendente lite, matrimonial property, Qatar Airlines pilot, Rule 43 Application, Rule 43 principles, South African divorce law, spousal maintenance, standard of living, stay-at-home spouse High Court Judgment Clarifies Rule 43 Relief in Wealthy Divorces: M.C D.C.R v A.P.W.R (2024 075727) [2025] ZAGPJHC 307 (19 March 2025). Background to the Rule 43 Application: Interim Maintenance Pending Divorce The case of M.C D.C.R v A.P.W.R (2024 075727) ZAGPJHC 307 (19 March 2025) revolves around a Rule 43 application… READ MORE
17/03/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Costs, Guardianship, Relocation 2025 ZAKZPHC 26, best interests of the child, Child Relocation, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, consent order rejection, Contact rights, court discretion, custody dispute, D.R.R v S.D.R, expert evidence, F v F, Family Advocate, Family Law, High Court South Africa, Johannesburg vs Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Division, legal precedent, Mossop J, parental alienation, Parental Rights, primary care, psychological reports, sibling separation, sibling unity, South African Law, Terblanche v Terblanche, upper guardian, Van der Linde case, ZDE v CE Divided No More: Sibling Unity Triumphs in D.R.R v S.D.R and Another (8947/2022P) [2025] ZAKZPHC 26 (13 March 2025). Background of the Family Dispute In the matter of D.R.R v S.D.R and Another (8947/2022P) ZAKZPHC 26 (13 March 2025), heard in the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Division,… READ MORE
25/02/2025 Bertus Preller Customary Law, Customary Marriages, Divorce, Islamic Law, Maintenance, Muslim Marriages, Rule 43, Rule 58, Spousal Maintenance AM v RM case, constitutional family law, custody disputes, Divorce Amendment Act 1 of 2024, divorce case law, divorce legislation, divorce maintenance, divorce proceedings, Essop v Haffejee case, interim relief, Islamic divorce, Islamic law in South Africa, judicial oversight, Legal Jurisdiction, legal precedent, Legal Protections, matrimonial disputes, matrimonial law, Muslim Marriage, Muslim spouses, Muslim women rights, religious divorce, Rule 43, SJ v SE case, South African divorce law, South African Family Law, South African High Court, spousal maintenance, Talaaq, Zaphiriou case South African Court Rules on Talaaq and Rule 43 Interim Relief in Divorce – H.A v N.A (144907/2024) [2025] ZAGPPHC 121 (13 February 2025). Introduction: A Landmark Case on Muslim Marriages and Rule 43 The case of H.A v N.A (144907/2024) ZAGPPHC 121 (13 February 2025) addresses a significant legal question concerning the application… READ MORE
30/01/2025 Bertus Preller Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Procedural Law, Section 7 Matrimonial Properties Act accrual system, acting justice friedman, asset declaration, Asset Disclosure, beneficial ownership, catch-me-if-you-can principle, company assets, constitutional powers, corporate structures, disclosure obligations, divorce litigation, divorce procedure, divorce proceedings, divorce tactics, financial disclosure, financial transparency, Gauteng High Court, High Court Judgment, interlocutory applications, Judicial Discretion, legal precedent, matrimonial law, matrimonial property, Matrimonial Property Act, Practice Directive, Rule 33(4), Rule 43, section 7 notice, separation application, South African Law, Trust assets Playing Hide and Seek with Assets? High Court Says ‘Game Over!’ – D.M v D.M (2021 043212) [2025] ZAGPJHC 31 (28 January 2025). The Novel Question: When Must a Spouse Comply with a Section 7 Notice? When it comes to financial disclosure in divorce proceedings, some spouses treat their assets like a magician's… READ MORE
23/01/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Parental Rights, Same Sex Couples best interests of child, blended families, child welfare, children's rights, children's act, Civil Union Act, Constitutional Rights, contact arrangements, Contact rights, court appointed experts, custody arrangements, drug assessment, educational evidence, expert evidence, Family Advocate, Family Court, Family Law, family relationships, joint custody, joint expert minute, Judicial Discretion, legal precedent, Parental Rights, psychiatric evaluation, Same-Sex Marriage, South African Law, surrogacy, teacher testimony, upper guardian, Western Cape High Court Best Interests of Children Triumph Over Expert Recommendations: D.R v N.M and Another (3358/24) [2025] ZAWCHC 12 (23 January 2025). Introduction: A Modern Family's Legal Journey in the Western Cape High Court In a landmark judgment delivered electronically on 23 January 2025, the Western Cape High Court grappled with complex… READ MORE