23/07/2026 Bertus Preller Alimony, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Cohabitation, Costs, Divorce, Financial non-disclosure, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Non-disclosure consequences, Procedural Law, Rule 43, Rule 43 Applications, Rule 43 Contempt, Rule 43 orders, Spousal Maintenance ability to pay, best interests of the child, child maintenance, Divorce Law, divorce proceedings, earning capacity, family law judgment, financial disclosure, financial non-disclosure, full and frank disclosure, H.L v B.L, inflated expenses, interim maintenance, interim relief, legal costs contribution, maintenance claim, Maintenance Order, maintenance pendente lite, marital standard of living, Minor Children, Njokweni J, Rule 43, Rule 43 Application, South African case law, South African Family Law, spousal maintenance, uberrima fides, Western Cape divorce, Western Cape High Court Candour, Children and the Limits of Interim Maintenance: H.L v B.L (2025/216979) [2026] ZAWCHC 350 (13 July 2026). The factual background and the parties’ competing claims In H.L v B.L (2025/216979) ZAWCHC 350 (13 July 2026), the Western Cape High Court was required to determine an application for… READ MORE
30/07/2025 Bertus Preller Divorce, Divorce summons South Africa, Irregular proceedings, Mediation, Procedural Law, Rule 30(2)(b) application, Rule 41A mediation notice Alternative Dispute Resolution, court rules, curable defect, Divorce Law, divorce litigation, divorce proceedings, Divorce process, divorce summons South Africa, divorce summons validity, Family Court, family disputes, Growthpoint case, irregular proceedings, legal remedies, Legal Technicalities, litigation procedure, mediation consideration, mediation notice omission, mediation notice requirements, non-compliance Rule 41A, Procedural Compliance, procedural defects, procedural irregularity, Rule 30 application, Rule 30(2)(b) application, Rule 41A mediation notice, South African courts, South African Family Law, Uniform Rules of Court Rule 41A Mediation Notices in Divorce: Why Missing Notices Don’t Kill Your Case. Introduction Rule 41A of the Uniform Rules of Court, introduced in 2020, mandates that litigants consider mediation at the inception of litigation. In divorce actions, this means a plaintiff must… READ MORE
23/07/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adultery, Division of Estate, Divorce, Divorce Statistics, Domestic Violence, Forfeiture of Benefits, Infidelity, Marriage accrual, adultery, Andy Byron, Asset Division, assets, B.R.B.M v R.K.B.M, C.M.M v A.M.S.M, community of property, Divorce Act, Divorce Law, Family Court, family law attorney, forfeiture, forfeiture orders, High Court, legal commentary, legal precedent, M v M, marital breakdown, Matyila v Matyila, misconduct, no-fault divorce, patrimonial benefits, public infidelity, section 9(1), South Africa, T.N v S.N, undue benefit, Wijker v Wijker Andy Byron Scandal: Public Infidelity and the Forfeiture of Assets under Section 9(1) of the Divorce Act in South Africa. South African divorce law permits courts to depart from the usual 50/50 division of marital assets in order to prevent an undeserved windfall to a spouse who caused or contributed… READ MORE
29/11/2024 Bertus Preller Divorce, Procedure, Redistribution Claim amendment applications, amendment costs, amendment of pleadings, amendment rules, civil procedure, court amendments, Court Applications, court process, court rules, divorce amendments, divorce claims, divorce courts, Divorce Law, divorce litigation, divorce pleadings, divorce proceedings, High Court judgments, Judicial Discretion, legal amendments, legal developments, Legal Procedure, matrimonial property, pending divorces, pleadings procedure, procedural law, property claims, property redistribution, redistribution claims, Rule 55A Amending Divorce Pleadings: RVB v JVB (A92/2024) [2024] ZAFSHC Opens Door for Redistribution Claims. Background: Marriage and Divorce Proceedings In October 2009, a couple embarked on their marital journey with a clear legal framework in place. They entered into an antenuptial contract that explicitly… READ MORE
24/10/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Best Interests of the Child, Child Maintenance, Children, Costs, Divorce, Family Law Court System South Africa, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Settlement agreements, Shared Residency attorney misconduct, attorney responsibility, Children's Best Interests, children's act, court officers, court protocols, court upper guardian, Divorce Act, Divorce Law, divorce maintenance, divorce proceedings, divorce settlements, family advocate investigations, Family Advocate role, Family Law, High Court judgments, judicial criticism, Legal Ethics, legal fees disallowed, legal practice standards, legal practitioner duties, maintenance obligations, professional boundaries, professional conduct, shared custody, shared residency, unopposed divorce, WhatsApp communication Attorney’s WhatsApp Blunder Costs Fees in Shared Residency Battle – P.V.Z v L.V.Z (047502/2024 ; 36830/2022 ; 064524/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1046. Shared Residency: Not Always the Default Solution for Divorced Parents In a groundbreaking judgment delivered by Acting Judge Haupt in P.V.Z v L.V.Z (047502/2024; 36830/2022; 064524/2023) ZAGPPHC 1046, the Gauteng… READ MORE
06/06/2024 Bertus Preller Divorce, Forfeiture of Benefits, In Community of Property 2024 ZAECMHC 37, Botha v Botha, Case Law, community of property, court judgment, division of property, Divorce Act, divorce judgment, Divorce Law, Eastern Cape Division, Engelbrecht v Engelbrecht, Family Law, Forfeiture of benefits, High Court, joint estate, Legal Analysis, legal appeal, legal precedent, marital benefits, marital home, matrimonial dispute, matrimonial property, pension interest, regional court, Section 9, South Africa, undue benefit, V G v T M, Wijker v Wijker, Z v Z Forfeiture of Benefits in Divorce: Analysis of V G v T M [2024] ZAECMHC 37. Introduction and Background of the Case The case of V G v T M ZAECMHC 37 revolves around an appeal by the appellant, V G, against the judgment rendered by… READ MORE
27/01/2024 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adultery, Coercive Control, Costs, Divorce, Emotional Abuse, Financial Abuse, Forfeiture of Benefits, In Community of Property, Infidelity, Physical Abuse, Psychological Abuse, Reasons for Dicorce Asset Division, asset forfeiture in divorce, court evidence, court judgments, divorce case analysis, Divorce Law, divorce litigation, divorce outcomes, divorce settlements, equitable distribution, extra-marital affairs, family court dynamics, family law case studies, forfeiture, legal implications, Legal proceedings, Legal Strategy, marital breakdown, Marriage Dissolution, matrimonial conduct, matrimonial disputes, patrimonial benefits, personal conduct, physical abuse, protection orders, South African Family Law, spousal allegations, spousal behavior, spouse behavior in divorce Infidelity, Abuse, and Forfeiture: Behind the Gavel – Deciphering the Role of Personal Conduct in Divorce Outcomes in South African Courts. – M.F.B v J.B (5674/2016) [2024] ZALMPPHC 7 (24 January 2024). Background and Claims In the case presided over by Naude-Odendaal J, the Plaintiff M.F.B filed for divorce against the Defendant J.B on 23 November 2016. The Plaintiff sought a decree… READ MORE
19/01/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance adventure hobbies, biokineticist mother, Child Custody, Constitutional Rights, divorce financial equity new case, Divorce Law, engineer father, equitable support, fair legal costs, Family court rulings, family law insights, family law precedent, financial disclosures, financial disparity, gender-neutral support, interim maintenance, K.A.E v W.N.E, legal advocacy, Legal Costs, legal expense allocation, Legal Representation, MAHOMED AJ ruling, matrimonial home, mother living with parents, new case analysis, new Rule 43 judgement, parenting plan, Rule 43, South African Family Law, spousal maintenance, spousal support Redefining Fairness: New Case Analysis on Spousal Support Where Mother Lived with Parents, Rule 43. – K.A.E v W.N.E (58415/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1488 (18 December 2023). Facts of the Case Background and Parties Marriage and Separation: The parties, K.A.E (applicant) and W.N.E (respondent), were married in 2010 and separated in 2017, a year after the birth… READ MORE
10/01/2024 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adversarial Legal System, Divorce, Forfeiture of Benefits, Pension Funds, Reasons for Dicorce asset allocation, asset forfeiture, community of property, conduct in marriage, divorce assets division, Divorce Law, divorce settlements, emotional abuse, equitable distribution, family court decisions, financial neglect, High Court ruling, legal implications, legal judgment, legal precedent, marital breakdown, marital contributions, marital misconduct, matrimonial property, pension fund interest, property rights, South African Family Law, spousal behaviour, Z v Z case Marriage Misconduct and Asset Forfeiture: A Pivotal Ruling in Z v Z (34253/2010) [2024] ZAGPJHC – 4 (10 January 2024). Case Overview In the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, the case of Z v Z (Case No: 34253/2010) was presided over by Adams J. The judgment, delivered… READ MORE
20/12/2023 Bertus Preller Antenuptial Contracts, Customary Law, Divorce ante-nuptial contract, civil law, community of property, consent in marriage, court judgment, customary law., customary marriage, Divorce Law, Family Law, High Court ruling, Legal Analysis, legal challenges, legal dispute, legal implications, legal precedent, marital regime, marriage registration, Mashisane v Mhlauli, matrimonial consent, matrimonial property, property rights, RCMA, South African Law, Supreme Court appeal, traditional customs Deciphering Customary vs Civil Marriage in South African Law: An In-Depth Look at Mashisane v Mhlauli (903/2022) [2023] ZASCA 176 (14 December 2023). Court Composition and Hearing The case of Mashisane v Mhlauli was heard by the Supreme Court of Appeal on 8 November 2023, presided over by Justices Mbatha, Mothle, Hughes, Weiner,… READ MORE