26/02/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Antenuptial Contracts, Child Maintenance, Children, Costs, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance accrual system, Asset Division, best interests of children, child maintenance, Court Decisions, court ruling, Divorce, divorce litigation, Equality of Arms, equitable distribution, Family Court, Family Law, financial disparity, Financial Disputes, interim relief, Legal Costs, legal obligations, legal principles, Legal proceedings, Legal Representation, maintenance determination, marital breakdown, marital standard of living, matrimonial assets, Parental Responsibilities, Rule 43, South Africa, spousal maintenance, Uniform Rules of Court Deciphering Divorce: A Rule 43 Ruling on Maintenance and a Contribution to Legal Costs – M Q v V S (0221062023) 2024 ZAGPJHC 188 (23 February 2024). Introduction to the Application for Maintenance and Legal Contributions In this Rule 43 application the court was presented with an intricate application concerning the financial sustenance and legal cost contributions… READ MORE
19/01/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance adventure hobbies, biokineticist mother, Child Custody, Constitutional Rights, divorce financial equity new case, Divorce Law, engineer father, equitable support, fair legal costs, Family court rulings, family law insights, family law precedent, financial disclosures, financial disparity, gender-neutral support, interim maintenance, K.A.E v W.N.E, legal advocacy, Legal Costs, legal expense allocation, Legal Representation, MAHOMED AJ ruling, matrimonial home, mother living with parents, new case analysis, new Rule 43 judgement, parenting plan, Rule 43, South African Family Law, spousal maintenance, spousal support Redefining Fairness: New Case Analysis on Spousal Support Where Mother Lived with Parents, Rule 43. – K.A.E v W.N.E (58415/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1488 (18 December 2023). Facts of the Case Background and Parties Marriage and Separation: The parties, K.A.E (applicant) and W.N.E (respondent), were married in 2010 and separated in 2017, a year after the birth… READ MORE
12/01/2024 Bertus Preller Costs, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions A.F v M.F, Case Law, constitutional principles, contribution quantum, divorce litigation, Equality of Arms, EVG v AJJV, fairness in divorce, Family Law, financial disparity, gender dynamics, interim maintenance, J.K v E.S.K, Judicial Discretion, L.B v D.F.B, Legal Costs, legal expenses, Legal Representation, matrimonial disputes, matrimonial support, past legal costs, Rule 43, South African Law, technological advancements Understanding Rule 43: The Framework for Legal Cost Contributions in Divorce Litigation. INTRODUCTION In the realm of matrimonial law, Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules of Court stands as a pivotal mechanism, designed to address the financial imbalances that often arise during… READ MORE
03/12/2023 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance attorney divorce, child support, contribution to costs rule 43, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement, equal representation, Family Court, Family Law, financial dependency, financial disparity, Financial Obligations, forensic accountant, gendered maintenance system, interim maintenance, Judicial Discretion, Legal Costs, legal fees contribution, Legal Representation, maintenance claims., marital standard of living, matrimonial litigation, Ozzy Osbourne reference, Rule 43 proceedings, South African divorce, spousal maintenance, urgent applications Legal Drama Meets Rock ‘n’ Roll: PILLAY AJ’s Ruling against Attorney/Respondent in a Rule 43 application with an Ozzy Osbourne Twist – J K v E K (15912/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 182 (29 November 2023) Background of the Case Marriage and Separation Details: The parties were married on 1 December 2012, with their marriage being out of community of property and incorporating the accrual system.… READ MORE