blog-image

Rule 43 Showdown: High Court Unravels Luxury Divorce in M.M v T.M (2023/012335) [2024] ZAGPJHC 835. (20 August 2024).

Background: A High-Flying Couple's Messy Divorce In the realm of high-profile divorces, the case of M.M v T.M (2023/012335) ZAGPJHC 835 (20 August 2024) stands out as a particularly complex…

READ MORE

blog-image

Equitable Division Triumphs: Insights from M.L.M v T.M.M (10864/15) [2024] ZAGPPHC 743 (2 August 2024).

Background of the M.L.M v T.M.M Divorce Case The case of M.L.M v T.M.M (10864/15) ZAGPPHC 743 (2 August 2024) involved a divorce proceeding in the High Court of South…

READ MORE

blog-image

Legal Drama Meets Rock ‘n’ Roll: PILLAY AJ’s Ruling against Attorney/Respondent in a Rule 43 application with an Ozzy Osbourne Twist – J K v E K (15912/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 182 (29 November 2023)

Background of the Case Marriage and Separation Details: The parties were married on 1 December 2012, with their marriage being out of community of property and incorporating the accrual system.…

READ MORE

blog-image

Rule 43: Navigating Maintenance and Financial Fairness in South African Divorce Proceedings and Adult Dependent Children.

Y.V.D.M v W.P.V.D.M (2021/43213) ZAGPJHC 1280 (9 November 2023) Introduction Case Background: This case involved an application under Rule 43 of the Uniform Rule of Court, related to a pending…

READ MORE