10/10/2026 Bertus Preller Constitutional Court divorce pension, Divorce, Equitable redistribution, Marriage out of community of property without accrual, Pension Funds, Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956, Pension interest, Pension interest divorce, Redistribution Claim, Redistribution of assets divorce, Redistribution order, Section 7(3) Divorce Act, Section 7(7)(c) Divorce Act [2026] ZACC 39, accrual system exclusion, antenuptial contract pension, B 20 of 2025, Bertus Preller, Constitutional Court divorce pension, Dambuza J, declaration of invalidity not suspended, Divorce Attorney Cape Town, EB v ER, GD v Minister of Home Affairs, gender discrimination divorce, General (Family) Laws Amendment Bill, just and equitable redistribution, KG v Minister of Home Affairs, marriage out of community of property without accrual, Matrimonial Property Act 1984, Pension Funds Act divorce, pension interest divorce, pension redistribution order, post-1984 marriages, prospective order divorce, redistribution of assets divorce, section 7(3) Divorce Act, section 7(7)(c) Divorce Act, section 7(8) Divorce Act, section 9(1) Constitution, section 9(3) unfair discrimination, South African Family Law Pension Interest Now Redistributable in All Marriages Without Accrual: The Constitutional Court Strikes Down Section 7(7)(c) of the Divorce Act in GD v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (CCT 60/25) [2026] ZACC 39 (9 October 2026). The facts and the road to the Constitutional Court The applicant, Mrs D, and the third respondent, Mr D, met in 1999 and married on 25 April 2004 out of… READ MORE
06/10/2026 Bertus Preller Accrual Calculation, Accrual Calculator, Accrual claims, Accrual system, Curator Ad Litem, Direct and substantial interest, Discretionary family trust, Divorce, Divorce and trusts South Africa, Joinder of beneficiaries, Joinder of trustees, Locus standi of beneficiary, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, Rule 10 Uniform Rules of Court, Section 13 Trust Property Control Act, Sufficient interest in trust, Termination of trust, Trust joinder divorce, Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988, Trusts, Trusts, Variation of trust provisions : joinder of trust in divorce, accrual system, amendment of particulars of claim, curator ad litem, de facto control of trust, direct and substantial interest, discretionary family trust, divorce and trusts South Africa, duties of trustees, family law South Africa, inherited farm, joinder of beneficiaries, joinder of mortgagee, joinder of trustees, locus standi of beneficiary, Master of the High Court, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, minor beneficiaries, non-joinder, Northern Cape High Court, points in limine, Rule 10 Uniform Rules of Court, Rule 28 amendment, section 13 Trust Property Control Act, substantially the same question of law or fact, sufficient interest in trust property, termination of trust, Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988, variation of trust provisions Joining a Family Trust to a Divorce: Why Rule 10 Shut the Door in S[…] v S[…] and Others: In re: S[…] v S[…] (2115/2020) [2026] ZANCHC 86 (5 October 2026). An Inherited Farm, a Discretionary Family Trust and a Marriage at an End: The Facts In S v S and Others: In re: S v S (2115/2020) ZANCHC 86 (5… READ MORE
28/05/2026 Bertus Preller Alimony, Clean Break Principle, Divorce, Maintenance, Maintenance termination, Matrimonial Properties Act, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, Pension Funds, Post-divorce maintenance, Rehabilitative maintenance, Section 7(2) maintenance, Spousal Maintenance accrual system, Antenuptial Contract, clean break principle, conduct of parties, contribution towards costs, CPI escalation, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, divorce South Africa, duration of marriage, earning capacity, employability, Family Law, financial needs and obligations, GEPF, industrial psychologist, Maintenance Order, marital standard of living, matrimonial property, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, onus to prove need, pendente lite maintenance, pension interest, rehabilitative maintenance, retirement, Section 7(2), section 7(8), spousal maintenance, stay-at-home spouse, termination of maintenance When the Money Must Stop: Rehabilitative Maintenance and the Clean Break in M.I.B (born H[…]) v D.B (2023-079189) [2026] ZAGPPHC 411 (2 May 2026). M.I.B (born H) v D.B (2023-079189) ZAGPPHC 411 (2 May 2026) This judgment of Smit AJ in the Gauteng Division, Pretoria, is a useful working example of how a court… READ MORE
20/01/2026 Bertus Preller Accrual Calculation, Accrual Calculator, Accrual claims, Accrual system, Alimony, Asset Disclosure, Costs, Divorce, Exceptional circumstances separation, Financial Disclosure, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance Calculator, Maintenance Calculator, matrimonial asset division, Matrimonial Properties Act, Rule 43, Rule 43 Applications, Rule 43 orders, section 10 MPA, Separation Applications, Separation of issues, Spousal Maintenance accrual system divorce proceedings, antenuptial contract accrual system, balance of convenience separation, bifurcated divorce proceedings, cost of separation applications, Denel v Vorster separation principles, divorce accrual claim, exceptional circumstances separation, expeditious disposal litigation, financially vulnerable spouse, formal tenders divorce, full disclosure matrimonial assets, Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act, maintenance security life policy, matrimonial property act section 7, matrimonial property disclosure duties, post-divorce maintenance uncertainty, prejudice to respondent spouse, procedural protection vulnerable spouse, Rule 33(4) separation of issues, Rule 43 interim relief, section 10 MPA deferred payment, section 4(2) divorce act, South African divorce law 2026, spousal maintenance claim, strike date accrual calculation, upfront payment accrual, Western Cape High Court family law, Wille J divorce judgment Why Formal Tenders Matter: Separation Refused Without Security for Vulnerable Spouse in AMG and Another v TSG (2025/057077) [2026] ZAWCHC 6 (19 January 2026). Factual Matrix: A Marriage Breakdown Complicated by Accrual and Maintenance Claims The matter before Wille, J concerned a marriage of over three decades that had irretrievably broken down, but in… READ MORE
16/01/2026 Bertus Preller Adultery, Children, Divorce, Divorce Act section 9, Forfeiture of Benefits, Forfeiture patrimonial benefits, In Community of Property, Matrimonial property forfeiture, Pension Funds, Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956, Pension interest, Substantial misconduct, Substantial misconduct, Undue benefit test adultery extra-marital relationship, balancing contributions misconduct, Botha v Botha forfeiture, BS v PS isolated misconduct, credibility assessment divorce proceedings, cumulative misconduct assessment, discretion costs divorce matters, divorce irretrievable breakdown, domestic contributions recognition, duration of marriage neutral factor, family law Gauteng Division, forfeiture patrimonial benefits, homemaker contributions divorce, humiliation spouse dignity, marriage in community of property, Mashola v Mashola holistic approach, Municipal Gratuity Fund, non-financial contributions marriage, partial forfeiture pension only, pension interest forfeiture, procreation with third party, public humiliation Facebook, sale joint estate property, section 9 Divorce Act, social media pregnancy announcement, substantial misconduct divorce, two-step forfeiture test, undue benefit divorce, value judgment forfeiture orders Forfeiture of Pension Benefits for Adultery, Procreation and Public Humiliation via Social Media: E.M v S.M (096891/2024) [2026] ZAGPPHC 8 (12 January 2026). Factual Background: Extra-Marital Relationship and the Birth of a Third Child The parties in this matter were married in community of property on 10 January 2011. Their marriage, which lasted… READ MORE
15/01/2026 Bertus Preller Accrual Calculation, Accrual Calculator, Accrual claims, Accrual system, Divorce, Eviction, PIE Act, Procedural Law, Procedure accrual claim, accrual disputes, accrual system, constitutional arguments, contingent rights, conveyancing law, divorce and property, divorce litigation, doctrine of notice, eviction defence, eviction proceedings, family law practitioners, finality in litigation, leave to appeal, matrimonial home, matrimonial property, PIE Act, property ownership, property transactions, reconsideration applications, registered ownership, section 17(2)(f), South African Family Law, spousal occupation, Superior Courts Act, Supreme Court of Appeal, third party purchasers, transfer of property Accrual Rights, Ownership and Eviction: Clear Limits on Spousal Claims Before Divorce — J.M.M and Another v Cara Dorothy Masureik and Others (807/2024) [2026] ZASCA 1 (8 January 2026). Factual Background and Procedural History The matter in J.M.M and Another v Cara Dorothy Masureik and Others arose from protracted and unresolved divorce proceedings between the first applicant and her… READ MORE
08/12/2025 Bertus Preller Accrual system, Clean Break Principle, Cohabitation, Costs, Direct financial contributions, Division of Estate, Divorce, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, EB v ER Constitutional Court, Equitable redistribution, Marriage, Marriage equality, matrimonial asset division, Out of community of property, Procedure, Punitive Cost Orders, Redistribution Claim, Rehabilitative maintenance, Section 7(2) maintenance, Section 7(3) Divorce Act, Section 7(4) contributions, Universal Partnership accrual system, antenuptial contract without accrual, Attorney and Client Costs, Beaumont v Beaumont, clean break principle, cohabitation before marriage, direct financial contributions, domestic partnership, EB v ER Constitutional Court, equitable redistribution, estate valuation disputes, family law redistribution, full court binding precedent, household duties, indirect contributions to estate, matrimonial asset division, Matrimonial Property Regime, out of community of property, Ponelat v Schrephfer, post-separation conduct, redistribution claims, rehabilitative maintenance, section 7(2) maintenance, section 7(3) Divorce Act, section 7(4) contributions, South African divorce law, spousal maintenance, trust asset disclosure, universal partnership Beyond Marriage: 30 Years, 40% Redistribution and the Universal Partnership Principle – E.L.M v L.M (9360/2022P) [2025] ZAKZPHC 127 (5 December 2025). Facts and Matrimonial Background: A 30-Year Relationship The parties in this matter were married out of community of property without the accrual system on 27 March 1999, following a six-year… READ MORE
26/10/2025 Bertus Preller Accrual claims, Divorce, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, Member spouse, Non-member spouse, Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956, Pension interest, Procedural Law, Procedure, Referee report, Retirement fund divorce, Section 37D, Settlement agreements, Tax liability pension interest accrual claims, accrual system, C.N.N v N.N, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, divorce settlement agreement, divorce trial court, legislative lacuna pension law, matrimonial property, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, member spouse, motion court jurisdiction, Ndaba v Ndaba, non-member spouse, Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956, pension funds legislation, pension interest, pension sharing divorce, referee report, retirement benefits divorce, retirement fund divorce, Reynolds v Reynolds, section 3 Matrimonial Property Act, section 37D, section 7(8), South African Family Law, T.M.W v J.J.W, tax liability pension interest, withdrawal benefits tax, ZAGPPHC 1093 2025 When Retirement Funds Cannot Settle Accrual Claims: D E C B v J M B (37464-2020) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1093 (21 October 2025) and the Jurisdictional Dilemma in South African Divorce Law. Factual Matrix: When a Referee's Report Reveals More Questions Than Answers The parties in this matter were married out of community of property with the application of the accrual system… READ MORE
21/04/2025 Bertus Preller Division of Estate, Divorce, Forfeiture of Benefits, Pension Funds, Recission of Divorce Orders community of property, court discretion, divorce act section 9, divorce costs, divorce judgment, divorce proceedings, divorce settlements, extramarital affairs, family law South Africa, financial abuse marriage, financial misconduct, Forfeiture of benefits, Gauteng High Court, High Court Judgment, justice kooverjie, legal precedent, Marital Assets, marriage breakdown, matrimonial property, partial rescission, pension claims, Pension Forfeiture, pension interests divorce, Property Division, South African divorce law, spousal misconduct, substantial misconduct, undue benefit, wijker test Marriage Misconduct Costs Husband Dearly: Court Orders Forfeiture of Property and Pension Benefits in M.J.L v L.O.L (22341/19; A288/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 331 (27 March 2025). Background: The Marriage and Subsequent Divorce Proceedings The recent High Court judgment in M.J.L v L.O.L (22341/19; A288/2023) ZAGPPHC 331 (27 March 2025) provides valuable insights into how South African… READ MORE
20/08/2024 Bertus Preller Arrears, Children, Divorce, Maintenance, Pension Funds appellate intervention, Asset Division, child best interests, child support, child welfare, divorce settlement, equitable maintenance, family court High Court Child maintenance, financial assessment, financial fairness, financial proportionality, High Court appeal, Judicial Discretion, Judicial Review, legal obligations, legal precedent, legal reform, magistrate court error, Maintenance Act, maintenance calculation, Maintenance Order, maintenance revision, parental obligations, Parental Rights, pension fund attachment, retirement benefits, retrenchment impact, South African Family Law, Training Layoff Scheme, unemployment consideration Balancing Act: High Court Overturns Punitive Maintenance Order in L.N v N.N (A2923/005472) [2024] ZAGPJHC 772 (19 August 2024). Background: The Divorce Settlement and Initial Maintenance Order The case of L.N v N.N (A2923/005472) ZAGPJHC 772 stems from a divorce settlement reached in August 2022. As part of this… READ MORE