12/11/2026 Bertus Preller Breakdown of the marriage, Division of Estate, Divorce, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, Divorce Act section 9, Duration of the marriage, Forfeiture of Benefits, Forfeiture patrimonial benefits, In Community of Property, Living annuities, Marital misconduct, Onus in forfeiture claims, Out of community of property, Partial forfeiture, Pension Funds, Pension interest, Substantial misconduct, Undue benefit test accrual system forfeiture, antenuptial contract benefits, Botha v Botha, breakdown of marriage, BS v PS, community of property, customary marriage divorce, Divorce Act 70 of 1979, Divorce Attorney Cape Town, divorce South Africa, duration of marriage, family law South Africa, forfeiture of patrimonial benefits, forfeiture order, GEPF pension forfeiture, I M v A M, joint estate, Mashola v Mashola, matrimonial property, partial forfeiture, pension interest, pension payout dissipation, pleading forfeiture, section 9 Divorce Act, substantial misconduct, Supreme Court of Appeal divorce, undue benefit, unduly benefited, Wijker v Wijker Forfeiture of Patrimonial Benefits under s 9(1) of the Divorce Act: What Wijker, Botha and Mashola Mean for Divorcing Spouses Section 9(1) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 allows a court granting a divorce to order the forfeiture of patrimonial benefits of the marriage by one spouse, wholly or… READ MORE