22/11/2025 Bertus Preller Balance of probabilities, Children, Court-ordered DNA testing, DNA evidence admissibility, DNA testing, Documentary evidence principles, Expert evidence requirements, Genetic testing reliability, Paternity confirmation, Paternity Disputes, Paternity Fraud, Paternity presumptions, Probative value of documents, SANAS guidelines, Scientific certainty standards authenticity of documents, balance of probabilities, buttressing oral evidence, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Civil Proceedings Evidence Act 25 of 1965, contemporaneous documentary evidence, court-ordered DNA testing, cross-examination requirements, cumulative evidence assessment, DNA evidence admissibility, documentary evidence principles, evidence law principles, expert evidence requirements, expert opinion evidence, family law South Africa, genetic testing reliability, Maintenance Act 99 of 1998, maintenance court proceedings, maintenance enquiries, Mayer v Williams, paternity disputes, paternity presumptions, prima facie evidence, probative value of documents, SANAS guidelines, scientific certainty standards, unrepresented litigants, viva voce testimony, Western Cape High Court When DNA Evidence Speaks Without Experts: Probabilities, Paternity and Documentary Evidence in E.A.P v S.W (A115/2025) [2025] ZAWCHC 540 (20 November 2025). Factual Background: A Protracted Paternity Dispute Spanning Two Decades This appeal concerned a finding by the Cape Town Magistrate's Court, sitting as a maintenance court, that the appellant was the… READ MORE
15/08/2025 Bertus Preller Adultery, Divorce, Forfeiture of Benefits, Forfeiture patrimonial benefits, Matrimonial property forfeiture, Paternity Fraud, Substantial misconduct adultery divorce law, candidate attorney resources, divorce act section 9, divorce appeal court, divorce law practitioners, divorce proceedings South Africa, DNA paternity fraud, extramarital affairs legal consequences, family law South Africa, financial misconduct divorce, forfeiture application evidence, forfeiture patrimonial benefits, GEPF forfeiture, Government Employees Pension Fund, High Court Limpopo, joint estate division, law student materials, marital breakdown irretrievable, marriage community property, matrimonial assets protection, matrimonial misconduct, matrimonial property forfeiture, pension benefits forfeiture, pension interest forfeiture, perjury maintenance court, South African divorce law, substantial misconduct, substantial misconduct definition, undue benefit test Beyond Adultery: When Substantial Misconduct Justifies Total Forfeiture – M.C.M v M.S.M (Appeal) (HCA16/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 153 (11 August 2025). Factual Matrix: A Marriage Marred by Infidelity and Deception The parties entered into a marriage in community of property on 19 November 2015, with a significant age disparity - the… READ MORE
30/10/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Maintenance, Paternity Fraud best interests of child, biological father, child maintenance, child rights, child support, child welfare, children's act, condictio indebiti, Constitutional Rights, court order, DNA evidence, DNA testing, enrichment claims, family bonds, Family Court, family law South Africa, family relationships, fraud claims, Judicial Discretion, legal duty, legal precedent, maintenance claims, maintenance recovery, marriage law, misattributed paternity, Parental Rights, paternity dispute, paternity fraud, paternity testing, Psychological Impact, WhatsApp evidence From Dad to Duped: South Africa’s Legal Dance with Paternity Fraud and the Quest for Truth. Understanding Paternity Fraud in South Africa: What You Need to Know Paternity fraud occurs when a mother, knowing or suspecting the truth, deliberately misidentifies a man as her child's biological… READ MORE
28/10/2024 Bertus Preller Children, Maintenance, Paternity Fraud, Procedure Access to Justice, affidavits via Zoom, birth certificate amendment, children's act, civil litigation, civil procedure, Constitutional Rights, court modernization, court precedent, digital evidence, divorce settlement, DNA results, DNA testing, electronic evidence, Family Law, High Court Judgment, judicial interpretation, legal presumption, legal presumptions, legal reform, legal technology, maintenance obligations, maintenance payments, parental rights termination, parenting plan, paternity fraud, remote legal procedures, South African Law, virtual commissioning, WhatsApp evidence From WhatsApp to Whoops: How Digital Messages and a Virtual Oath Transformed Paternity Law in VJS v SH (19578/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 333: Can You Zoom Your Way to Justice? Background: A Paternity Dispute Emerges from WhatsApp Messages In a significant judgment from the Western Cape High Court, a project manager working at the US Embassy in Pakistan sought to… READ MORE
29/07/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Infidelity, Maintenance, Parental Rights, Paternity Fraud biological father, Botha v Dreyer, Child's Best Interests, children's act, comparative law, DNA testing, Family Law, genetic testing, inheritance rights, legal presumptions, Legal Reforms, maintenance obligations, misattributed paternity, Nel v Jonker, Parental Rights, paternity disputes, paternity law, putative father, South Africa Navigating the Complexities of Paternity Law in South Africa: From DNA Testing to Misattributed Paternity. Introduction to Paternity Law in South Africa Paternity law in South Africa is a multifaceted domain that intersects with various legal, social, and ethical issues. The determination of paternity is… READ MORE