25/04/2026 Bertus Preller Attorney and client costs, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Children's Court, constitutional rights of children, Contempt of Court, Costs de bonis propriis, Family Advocate, Lawyer-client alignment, Punitive costs orders activist intervention family law, attorney professional conduct, attorney withdrawal, best interests of the child, child care and contact, child custody disputes, Constitution section 1(c), contempt of court, costs de bonis propriis, Court Order Compliance, Fakie contempt, Family Advocate, family law South Africa, High Court contempt proceedings, High Court parenting disputes, lay assistant family law, Legal Practice Council referral, M.N v J.E, parental responsibilities and rights, parenting litigation, Rule of Law, S v Beyer, social workers, suspended fine, suspended imprisonment, unauthorised legal assistance, Uniform Rule 16(4), urgent child return order, ZAWCHC 189 When Activism Crosses the Line: Contempt, Child Welfare and Attorney Accountability in M.N v J.E and Another (2025/221659) [2026] ZAWCHC 189 (20 April 2026). The Facts: A Child Removed from the Father’s Care, an Urgent Return Order, and the Contempt Sequel In M.N v J.E and Another (2025/221659) ZAWCHC 189 (20 April 2026), Pangarker… READ MORE
30/03/2026 Bertus Preller Amputation minor child, Best interests of child short-term, Best Interests of the Child, Children, constitutional rights of children, Medical treatment minor child, Religious beliefs parental refusal, Section 129(9) Children's Act, Surgical intervention minor child, Traditional healing consent amputation minor child, best interests of the child, children's constitutional rights, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Family Advocate memorandum, Hay v B, Life Health Care Group v JMS, locus standi hospital, medical treatment minor child, medically accepted alternative, meningococcal septicaemia, National Health Act 61 of 2003, Pangarker J, parental consent minor child, parental rights versus child's rights, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, religious beliefs parental refusal, section 129 Children's Act, section 129(10) Children's Act, section 129(6) Children's Act, section 129(9) Children's Act, section 28(2) Constitution, section 36 Constitution limitation of rights, surgical intervention minor child, traditional healing consent, upper guardian High Court, urgent application minor child, Western Cape High Court, ZAWCHC 150 When Faith Meets the Scalpel: How the Western Cape High Court Stepped In to Save a Six-Year-Old’s Life — Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital v MD and Another (2026/049305) [2026] ZAWCHC 150 (27 March 2026). The Facts: A Six-Year-Old, Gangrenous Feet and a Family's Unyielding Faith On 19 January 2026, a six-year-old girl, referred to as AD to protect her identity, was admitted to the… READ MORE
07/08/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adversarial Legal System, Child Bullying, Child protection, Children, Children's Court, Conduct of Childcare Experts, constitutional rights of children, Contempt of Court, Costs, Curator Ad Litem, Emotional Abuse, Family reunification, Grandparents Rights, Guardianship, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Hostile Family Lawyers, Joint Decision Making, Parental Alienation, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Punitive Cost Orders, Reunification, Reunification therapy, Section 28 Constitution, Views of the Child AB-PA, attachment-based parental alienation, Australian parenting orders, best interests of the child, child’s rights, children’s act, co-parenting programs, contempt enforcement, curator ad litem, custody variation, differential diagnosis, emotional abuse, expert evidence, Family Advocate inquiries, forensic psychologist, interim orders, international comparison, legislative reform, multi-disciplinary approach, parental alienation, parenting coordinator, preventive education, psychological assessment, reunification therapy, Rule 43 applications, South African Family Law, supervised contact, therapeutic court orders, UK CAFCASS model, US friendly parent factor Parental Alienation in South African Family Law: Legal Framework, Case Analysis, and Comparative Perspectives. Introduction Parental alienation has emerged as one of the most heart-wrenching dilemmas in South African family law, surfacing with alarming frequency in high-conflict divorces and custody battles. At its core,… READ MORE
18/07/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Children's Court, constitutional rights of children, Divorce, Family reunification, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, International Travel, Parental Alienation, Relocation, Reunification, Section 28 Constitution best interests of child, child abduction risk, child welfare, child's voice, children's act, contact arrangements, cross-border custody, custody dispute, custody evaluation, custody proceedings, expert evidence, Family Advocate, family court judgment, family law South Africa, habitual residence, interim custody, international child custody, international divorce, international family law, international jurisdiction, Mirror Orders, non-Hague country, Parental Abduction, parental coaching, Parental Rights, psychological assessment, Qatar family law, relocation application, Western Cape High Court When Borders Divide Families: M.K v A.J.K (11407/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 288 (7 July 2025) – International Child Custody and the Qatar Dilemma. Factual Background: When Divorce Proceedings Cross International Borders This matter exemplifies the complex legal and practical challenges that arise when families with established lives in foreign jurisdictions face marital breakdown.… READ MORE
13/07/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Child protection, Children, Children's Court, Conduct of Childcare Experts, constitutional rights of children, Family reunification, Foster care, Grandparents Rights, Kinship care, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Section 28 Constitution 4 July 2025, best interests of the child South Africa, Cape Town High Court, care and contact orders, child custody South Africa, child protection, child removal South Africa, child witness protection, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Children’s Court appeal, constitutional rights of children, Dr Astrid Martalas, ex parte court orders, family law South Africa, family reunification judgment, foster care legal challenge, High Court appeal 2025, kinship care, legal precedent family law, legal safeguards in child care, Magistrate Sipoyo judgment, no-contact order South Africa, Parental Rights, procedural fairness South Africa, psychological harm attachment, Rule of Law family matters, S.E.T and Others v Department of Justice, Section 28 Constitution, ZAWCHC 282 “Torn Apart Without Cause”: High Court Slams Children’s Court in S.E.T and Others v Department of Justice and Another (A83/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 282 (4 July 2025). The Factual Matrix: Arrests, Allegations and the Path to Atlantis Court This matter originated in deeply troubling circumstances involving two minor children, a six-year-old girl (X) and a one-year-old boy… READ MORE