11/10/2026 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Parental Rights, Parental rights and responsibilities, Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013, School rugby governance, School rugby recruitment, School sport law, Schoolboy Rugby South Africa, Schoolboy rugby transfers best interests of the child section 28, Bought Not Built, Centre for Child Law v Media 24, child privacy South Africa, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, divorce school move child, family law South Africa, Information Regulator complaint, NM v Smith privacy, parental consent children’s act, parenting plan school change, POPIA administrative fine R10 million, POPIA children’s information, POPIA penalties imprisonment, Press Code children, publication of schoolboy rugby transfers, rugby blog privacy, rugby bursary school transfer, schoolboy rugby poaching, schoolboy rugby recruitment, schoolboy rugby transfer sheets, section 18 parental responsibilities and rights, section 30 co-holders, section 31 major decisions, section 34 POPIA, section 35 POPIA competent person, section 7 POPIA journalism exclusion, section 99 POPIA damages, separated parents school decision Schoolboy Rugby Transfer Sheets: What Parental Consent Means in Family Law and What POPIA Does to Blogs That Publish Without It. In a recent article for my Substack newsletter I looked at the running "transfer sheets" that some rugby websites keep of schoolboy players moving between schools, and I asked a… READ MORE
03/10/2026 Bertus Preller Alimony, Best Interests of the Child, Care and Contact, Child Maintenance, Childcare Expert, Children, Children's matters South Africa, Civil contempt South Africa, Contact Rights, Contempt of Court, Costs, Curator Ad Litem, Divorce, Forensic psychologist mandate, Hired Gun Expert, Maintenance, Parental rights and responsibilities, Pendente Lite, Primary Residence, Primary residence dispute, Rule 43, Rule 43 Applications, Rule 43 Contempt, Rule 43 orders, Unlawful retention of a child, Urgency, Urgent applications, Variation Rule 43(6) best interests of the child, breach of court order, child abuse allegations, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Contact rights, court-appointed expert, curator ad litem, divorce litigation, DTL v GB, expert bias, family advocate report, family law South Africa, forensic psychologist mandate, Gauteng High Court Johannesburg, hired gun expert, interim care and contact, parental alienation, parental rights and responsibilities, pendente lite order, primary care, primary residence, Rule 43 variation, Rule 43(6), Rule 67A(3), scale C costs, self-help, sheriff enforcement, unlawful retention of a child, Urgent Application Self-Help Never Pays: Unlawful Retention of a Child and the Limits of Rule 43(6) — L.C.E v C.E (2026/226362) [2026] ZAGPJHC 1070 (29 September 2026). Neutral Citation: E v E (2026-226362) ZAGPJHC --- (29 September 2026) The Facts: A Four-Year-Old Caught in the Crossfire of a Brutal Divorce The parties in L.C.E v C.E (2026/226362)… READ MORE