10/11/2023 Bertus Preller Alimony, anti-dissipatory relief, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Rule 43 asset dissipation, attorney and client scale, Constitutional Rights, court discretion, divorce litigation, equitable access, financial analysis, financial disclosure, financial hardship, gender disparities, legal costs contribution, maintenance payments, matrimonial cases, matrimonial property, prolixity in legal documents, Rule 43, South African Law, Uniform Rules of Court, urgent applications Rule 43 in Action: Deciphering Court Orders on Contribution to Costs and Attorney-Client Scale Cost Orders in Divorce Cases. L.S.P. v R.S.P (2014/2941) ZAGPJHC 1281 (9 November 2023) Summary of the Case Introduction and Background Rule 43 Application: The plaintiff (Applicant) had filed a Rule 43 application in an… READ MORE
02/11/2023 Bertus Preller Alimony, Arrears, Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Marriage, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance Divorce Act, divorce proceedings, financial disclosure, financial inequity, inheritance, interim maintenance, legal precedent, maintenance obligations, marital contribution, marital standard of living, non-disclosure, ophthalmologist, Rule 43, Section 7(2), South African Family Law, spousal support, Uniform Rules of Court, Urgent Application, variation order Balancing the Scales of Interim Maintenance: A South African Case Study on Inheritance and Rule 43 Orders. L.M v R.D.M (EL789/2022) ZAECELLC 32 (31 October 2023) Case Summary: The applicant, an ophthalmologist, instituted an application seeking, amongst others, variation of an Order granted by Stretch J on… READ MORE