03/10/2026 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Constitutional Court customary law, Customary Law, Customary Marriages, gender equality, Imbeleko, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998, section 211(3), section 9 Constitution, Ulwaluko, Umgidi, Umngeno, Xhosa initiation age of majority, Attorney and Client Costs, Bhe case, co-holder consultation, customary law and Constitution, declaratory order, dependent adult child, final interdict, Gender Equality, Imbeleko, living customary law, Mbungela, MM v MN, parental responsibilities and rights, rule 6(12) urgency, section 18 Children's Act, section 211(3), Section 31 Children's Act, section 9 Constitution, Self-Created Urgency, Setlogelo, Shilubana, standing of parent, Superior Courts Act, Ulwaluko, Umgidi, Umngeno, Xhosa initiation, Z v Z A Mother’s Place at the Umgidi: Living Customary Law, Gender Equality and the Myth of the Magic Age of 18 — S.Z.Z v S.Z (2026/196397) [2026] ZAGPJHC 1099 (25 September 2026). The Facts: A Mother Excluded from Her Son's Rite of Passage In S.Z.Z v S.Z (2026/196397) ZAGPJHC 1099 (25 September 2026) a divorced mother approached the Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, on… READ MORE
06/06/2024 Bertus Preller Divorce, Forfeiture of Benefits, In Community of Property 2024 ZAECMHC 37, Botha v Botha, Case Law, community of property, court judgment, division of property, Divorce Act, divorce judgment, Divorce Law, Eastern Cape Division, Engelbrecht v Engelbrecht, Family Law, Forfeiture of benefits, High Court, joint estate, Legal Analysis, legal appeal, legal precedent, marital benefits, marital home, matrimonial dispute, matrimonial property, pension interest, regional court, Section 9, South Africa, undue benefit, V G v T M, Wijker v Wijker, Z v Z Forfeiture of Benefits in Divorce: Analysis of V G v T M [2024] ZAECMHC 37. Introduction and Background of the Case The case of V G v T M ZAECMHC 37 revolves around an appeal by the appellant, V G, against the judgment rendered by… READ MORE