24/10/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Best Interests of the Child, Child Maintenance, Children, Costs, Divorce, Family Law Court System South Africa, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Settlement agreements, Shared Residency attorney misconduct, attorney responsibility, Children's Best Interests, children's act, court officers, court protocols, court upper guardian, Divorce Act, Divorce Law, divorce maintenance, divorce proceedings, divorce settlements, family advocate investigations, Family Advocate role, Family Law, High Court judgments, judicial criticism, Legal Ethics, legal fees disallowed, legal practice standards, legal practitioner duties, maintenance obligations, professional boundaries, professional conduct, shared custody, shared residency, unopposed divorce, WhatsApp communication Attorney’s WhatsApp Blunder Costs Fees in Shared Residency Battle – P.V.Z v L.V.Z (047502/2024 ; 36830/2022 ; 064524/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1046. Shared Residency: Not Always the Default Solution for Divorced Parents In a groundbreaking judgment delivered by Acting Judge Haupt in P.V.Z v L.V.Z (047502/2024; 36830/2022; 064524/2023) ZAGPPHC 1046, the Gauteng… READ MORE
06/08/2024 Bertus Preller Divorce, Procedural Law, Procedure, Recission of Divorce Orders attorney negligence, bona fide defence, civil litigation, contradictory evidence, costs order, court appearance, default judgment, Divorce, forfeiture, High Court Judgment, Legal Representation, matrimonial benefits, procedural missteps, rescission application, Rule 31(2), Rule 42(1)(a), Saloojee principle, South African Law, unopposed divorce Divorce, Dismissal, and Dueling Affidavits: How Attorneys’ Missteps Doomed a Rescission Bid in S.P.M v L.M (Born M) (56859/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 729 (2 August 2024). Background: The Divorce Proceedings and Rule 27 Application The case of S.P.M v L.M (Born M) (56859/2021) ZAGPPHC 729 stems from a divorce action initiated in November 2021. The parties… READ MORE