14/08/2025 Bertus Preller Divorce order enforcement, Divorce settlement defects, Litis contestatio, Procedure, Rescission applications, Rescission applications, Settlement agreement interpretation, Settlement agreement variation, Settlement agreements, Urgency, Urgent applications, Validity Divorce Settlement Agreement Alienation of Land Act, bond approval, breach letters, Case Law Analysis, Co-ownership, Consent Papers, conveyancing, divorce order enforcement, estate agents, Family Law, forum selection, High Court jurisdiction, judicial comity, litis contestatio, marital property disputes, matrimonial property, Powers of Attorney, property transfer disputes, Regional Court jurisdiction, rescission applications, Rule 6(12), sale agreements, sectional title, Self-Created Urgency, South African property law, urgent applications, urgent motion proceedings, void ab initio, Western Cape High Court Self-Created Urgency and Invalid Property Agreements: Key Lessons from SPR v NV (2025/119985) [2025] ZAWCHC 346 (13 August 2025). Factual Matrix: Divorce Order Enforcement and Property Transfer Disputes The matter concerned the enforcement of a Regional Court divorce order incorporating a consent paper, where former spouses held immovable property… READ MORE
24/01/2024 Bertus Preller Child Maintenance, Children, Maintenance Case Law Analysis, Cause of Action, Court Procedures, Court Rulings, Courtroom Tactics, Defense Strategy, Exception Handling, Exception Success, Judicial Reasoning, Legal Claims, Legal Clarification, Legal Disputes, Legal Doctrine, Legal Exceptions, Legal Framework, legal interpretation, Legal Obstructions, Legal precedents, legal principles, Legal Technicalities, Litigation Process, Litigation Strategy, Over-Technical Approach, Pleading Challenges, Pleading Sufficiency, Pleadings Assessment, Procedural Tactics, Substantive Law, Substantive Questions Navigating Parental Maintenance Obligations and Mastering Legal Exceptions: The KGANYAGO J Judgment in Context. – U.DJ v J.H.O (9169/2022) [2024] ZALMPPHC 2 (15 January 2024). Background and Plaintiff’s Claims The case involves the plaintiff and defendant, who are the parents of a child now of majority age. Following the breakdown of their relationship, the child… READ MORE