16/12/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse of Process, Access to justice section 34, Attorney and client costs, Bona fide defence, Civil contempt South Africa, Contempt of Court, Contempt of court maintenance, Contumacious conduct, Costs, Discovery, Divorce, Duty to court, Good cause rescission, Hostile Family Lawyers, Inherent powers of court, Legal practitioner complicity, legal practitioner ethical duties, LPC Code of Conduct, Matrimonial proceedings discovery, Muslim Marriages, Procedural Law, Procedural non-compliance, Procedure, Punitive costs orders, Rescission of default judgment, Rule 35(1) discovery, Rule 35(3) notice, Rule 35(7), Section 173 Constitution, Serial contempt, Stalingrad tactics, Striking out defence, Uniform Form Rules of Court, Vexatious Litigant, Vexatious litigation, Vindicating court authority abuse of court process, Attorney and Client Costs, bona fide defence, chamber book applications, contempt of court, contumacious conduct, discovery obligations, divorce action, duty to court, family law litigation, good cause rescission, inherent powers of court, legal practitioner complicity, legal practitioner ethical duties, LPC Code of Conduct, maintenance claims, procedural non-compliance, punitive costs orders, rescission of default judgment, Rule 35(3) notice, Rule 35(7), section 173 Constitution, section 60.1, section 60.2, serial contempt, Stalingrad tactics, striking out defence, vindicating court authority, wilful default When the Court Draws a Line in the Sand: Striking Out for Serial Contempt and Abuse of Process in S.L v A.C (8030/2021) [2025] ZAWCHC 565 (4 December 2025). Introduction The case of S.L v A.C (8030/2021) ZAWCHC 565 (4 December 2025) serves as a stark reminder that access to justice does not mean access to courts on one's… READ MORE
30/04/2024 Bertus Preller Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts abuse of process, child care cases, Children’s Court, conflicts of interest, counselling psychologist, Dickinson v Fisher's Executors 1914 AD 424, disciplinary inquiries, disciplinary proceedings, disciplinary sanctions, Els v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (965/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 112, ethical violations, exploitation, facilitator, HPCSA, interlocutory appeal, mental health professionals, multiple relationships, piecemeal appeals, power imbalance, professional boundaries, professional ethics, professional misconduct, Regulation 11, Stalingrad tactics, therapeutic relationship, therapeutic services, unprofessional conduct, vulnerable clients, Wahlhaus principle, Zuma v Downer 2024 (2) SA 356 (SCA) Crossing Boundaries: The Perils of Multiple Relationships in Child Care Cases – Els v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (965/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 112 (25 April 2024) Introduction The Western Cape High Court recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of Els v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (965/2023) ZAWCHC 112 (25 April… READ MORE