04/11/2026 Bertus Preller Abuse of Process, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Forensic Investigations in Divorce, Privacy Rights, Subpoenas, Third-Party Subpoenas abuse of process, Beinash v Wixley, compel compliance subpoena, divorce financial disclosure, Eastern Circuit Local Division, fishing expedition subpoena, forensic auditor divorce, forensic investigation divorce, Gamble J order, in terrorem subpoena, lay litigants High Court, matrimonial litigation South Africa, Myers v Marcus, non-party financial records, patrimonial consequences of marriage, Plascon-Evans rule, privacy and confidentiality subpoena, R.H.K v Lawrence, Rule 38 subpoena, Rule 43(6) forensic expert, section 35(4) Superior Courts Act, section 36(5)(c) Superior Courts Act, setting aside subpoena, subpoena duces tecum, Tasima binding court orders, Thembalethu High Court, third party subpoena divorce, Van Zyl J, ZAWCHC 647 Fishing Expedition Foiled: Third-Party Subpoenas, Forensic Experts and Abuse of Process in R.H.K v Lawrence (587/2023) [2026] ZAWCHC 647 (2 November 2026) This case is about a spouse in a pending divorce who, relying on a Rule 43(6) order that allowed her to appoint a forensic expert to investigate her husband’s estate,… READ MORE
02/04/2026 Bertus Preller Alimony, Children, Costs, Divorce, Financial non-disclosure, Maintenance, Non-disclosure consequences, Punitive costs orders, Rule 43, Rule 43 Applications, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Rule 43 orders, Spousal Maintenance, Variation Rule 43(6) 2-2-3 contact schedule, care and contact, child maintenance, costs contribution, divorce costs, divorce proceedings, Fairways Business Trust, Family Advocate, family trust, financial non-disclosure, forensic auditor, Genius Academy, interim maintenance, legal costs contribution, material change of circumstances, matrimonial property, medical aid maintenance, minor child, patriarchal misdirection, pende lite maintenance, right of first refusal, Rule 43, Rule 43(6), social worker report, South African Family Law, spousal maintenance, sworn valuator, Thembalethu High Court, VW Touareg When Opacity Meets Obligation: Spousal Maintenance, Financial Non-Disclosure and the Limits of Rule 43 — J.V.D.B v O.V.D.B (234/25) [2026] ZAWCHC 136 (23 March 2026). The Facts and Background to the Rule 43(6) Application The matter of J.V.D.B v O.V.D.B (234/25) ZAWCHC 136 (23 March 2026) came before Thulare J in the High Court of… READ MORE