04/11/2026 Bertus Preller Abuse of Process, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Forensic Investigations in Divorce, Privacy Rights, Subpoenas, Third-Party Subpoenas abuse of process, Beinash v Wixley, compel compliance subpoena, divorce financial disclosure, Eastern Circuit Local Division, fishing expedition subpoena, forensic auditor divorce, forensic investigation divorce, Gamble J order, in terrorem subpoena, lay litigants High Court, matrimonial litigation South Africa, Myers v Marcus, non-party financial records, patrimonial consequences of marriage, Plascon-Evans rule, privacy and confidentiality subpoena, R.H.K v Lawrence, Rule 38 subpoena, Rule 43(6) forensic expert, section 35(4) Superior Courts Act, section 36(5)(c) Superior Courts Act, setting aside subpoena, subpoena duces tecum, Tasima binding court orders, Thembalethu High Court, third party subpoena divorce, Van Zyl J, ZAWCHC 647 Fishing Expedition Foiled: Third-Party Subpoenas, Forensic Experts and Abuse of Process in R.H.K v Lawrence (587/2023) [2026] ZAWCHC 647 (2 November 2026) This case is about a spouse in a pending divorce who, relying on a Rule 43(6) order that allowed her to appoint a forensic expert to investigate her husband’s estate,… READ MORE