Life Partnerships – Maintenance – Missed Opportunity – EW v VH & Women’s Legal Trust Centre, case no. 12272/2022.

In previous articles I wrote about an application in the Cape High Court, extending the common law regarding to maintenance to partners in a life partnership. A descending judgement was handed down on 17 March 2023.

The applicant and respondent were previously  involved  in  a romantic  relationship  for  a period  of  8  to 9 years  until 26 April 2022 when the respondent vacated the erstwhile common  home.  Three young children  were born from their relationship.  When the parties commenced their romantic  relationship they were still entangled  with  their previous  partners. The applicant had not yet terminated her relationship with her former partner/boyfriend and the respondent remained  married  until 2019.

Judges Cloete and Slingers found inter alia stated that: “….a  ‘permanent  romantic  relationship’  is  not  synonymous   with  a permanent  life  partnership  wherein  the  parties  undertook  reciprocal  duties  of support to one another within the context of a familial setting.  Our understanding of the case law referred to herein  is that a permanent romantic not per se equate to proof of the assumption of a reciprocal duty of support in a familial setting.

Judge Wille delivered a descending judgement and stated: “While  I agree with most of their reasoning,  I    would have granted a different order in the result.   This  is primarily because,  in my respectful view, this is a matter mainly consisting  of constitutional  ingredients and revolves around the granting only of interim financial  relief to the applicant”.

No doubt the matter will now head for an appeal.

A copy of the judgement can be downloaded below: