13/08/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Parental Rights, Procedure, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance, Views of the Child Redefining Rule 43: M.M v R.O (6296/2022) [2024] ZAWCHC 203 Reshapes South African Family Law, (13 August 2024). Background: A Complex Web of Family and Financial Affairs The recent case of M.M v R.O (6296/2022) ZAWCHC 203 (13 August 2024) presents a intricate tapestry of family dynamics, financial… READ MORE
13/08/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Family Law Court System South Africa, Grandparents Rights, Mediation, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Urgency, Views of the Child Alternative Dispute Resolution, bereavement, best interests of the child, child access, Child Custody, child law, child welfare, children's act, Court Procedures, extended family rights, Family Court, family disputes, Family Law, family relationships, grandparents' rights, Judicial Discretion, legal delay, legal precedent, Legal Procedures, legal urgency, Mediation, parental death, procedural requirements, Self-Created Urgency, South African Law, Urgent Application, urgent court roll, Western Cape High Court Urgency Dismissed in Grandparents’ Access Case: E.S and Others v P.S and Another (16138/24) [2024] ZAWCHC 201 (12 August 2024). Background: A Family's Struggle for Contact After Tragedy In the heart-wrenching case of E.S and Others v P.S and Another (16138/24) ZAWCHC 201 (12 August 2024), the Western Cape High… READ MORE
08/08/2024 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adversarial Legal System, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Domestic Violence, Holiday Travel, International Travel, Relocation, Views of the Child best interests of child, child welfare, children's act, co-parenting, court order, custody rights, Divorce, Family Advocate, Family Court, Immigration Act, international travel, judicial interpretation, Legal Guardianship, minor's travel, parental consent, Parental Rights, parenting plan, South African Law, travel regulations Navigating Parental Consent for International Travel: Insights from J.S v R.S (4146/24) [2024] ZAWCHC 199 (2 August 2024) Background: A Battle Over Holiday Travel with a Minor Child In the recent Western Cape High Court case of J.S v R.S (4146/24) ZAWCHC 199 (2 August 2024), Acting Justice… READ MORE
07/08/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Hostile Family Lawyers, Maintenance, Procedure, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance aggressive litigation tactics, asset depletion, child welfare, divorce process critique, exorbitant legal fees, financial disclosure, financial hardship, high-conflict divorce, interim relief, judicial case management, Legal Costs, legal reform, maintenance variation, Material change in circumstances, matrimonial property, minor child impact, prolonged litigation, Rule 43, South African Family Law A Decade of Divorce: L.S v J.S (23967/2012) [2024] ZAGPJHC 653 Exposes Flaws in South African Family Law (2 August 2024). Background: A 12-Year Divorce Battle Reaches New Heights The case of L.S v J.S (23967/2012) ZAGPJHC 653 (2 August 2024) presents a stark illustration of the perils of prolonged divorce… READ MORE
31/07/2024 Bertus Preller Actio communi dividundo, Adversarial Legal System, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Costs, Divorce, Hostile Family Lawyers, Marital Regimes, Rule 43 actio communi dividundo, best interests of the child, children's interests, costs order, divorce proceedings, equity, family disputes, Family Law, Gauteng Division, High Court, joint ownership, legal precedent, litigation conduct, matrimonial home, Property Division, property rights, punitive costs, Robson v Theron, Rule 43, scale B costs, South African Law, transfer of property, valuation Dividing the Family Home and Awarding Costs: N M v M M and Another (2023/008561) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1818 Balances Property Rights, Children’s Interests, and Litigation Conduct. The Actio Communi Dividundo: Terminating Joint Ownership During Divorce Proceedings In the recent case of N M v M M and Another (2023/008561) ZAGPJHC 1818 (24 July 2024), the Gauteng… READ MORE
29/07/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Infidelity, Maintenance, Parental Rights, Paternity Fraud biological father, Botha v Dreyer, Child's Best Interests, children's act, comparative law, DNA testing, Family Law, genetic testing, inheritance rights, legal presumptions, Legal Reforms, maintenance obligations, misattributed paternity, Nel v Jonker, Parental Rights, paternity disputes, paternity law, putative father, South Africa Navigating the Complexities of Paternity Law in South Africa: From DNA Testing to Misattributed Paternity. Introduction to Paternity Law in South Africa Paternity law in South Africa is a multifaceted domain that intersects with various legal, social, and ethical issues. The determination of paternity is… READ MORE
18/07/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Costs, Parental Rights, Procedure, Rule 43 abuse of process, best interests of the child, Child Custody, child welfare, Constitutional Rights, divorce proceedings, Family Law, forum shopping, High Court, interim orders, Judicial Discretion, Legal Procedure, Legal Strategy, matrimonial matters, regional court, Rule 43, Rule 58, South African Law, urgency Navigating the Maze: Forum Shopping and Urgency in Family Law – Insights from D.G.S.F v M.F and Another (347/2024) [2024] ZAFSHC 207. Background: A High-Stakes Rule 43 Application The case of D.G.S.F v M.F and Another (347/2024) ZAFSHC 207 (2 July 2024) centres on a contentious Rule 43 application in the Free… READ MORE
14/07/2024 Bertus Preller Artificial fertilisation, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Parental Rights, Same Sex Couples, Surrogacy, Surrogacy Laws South Africa altruistic surrogacy, artificial fertilization, best interests of the child, breach of agreement, case-by-case approach, children's act, commercial surrogacy, commissioning parents, court confirmation, domicile requirement, Ex parte Three Surrogacy Applications, Family Law, genetic link, High Court, legal parentage, Legal Recourse, Legal Requirements, psychological evaluation, same-sex couples, South Africa, surrogacy, surrogacy advertising, surrogacy agreement, surrogacy ethics, Surrogacy Laws South Africa, surrogate compensation, surrogate mother, termination rights Navigating the Legal Landscape of Surrogacy in South Africa: Current Law and Recent Developments. Introduction In navigating the complex terrain of starting a family, many South Africans are turning to surrogacy as a viable option. The Surrogacy Law in South Africa plays a pivotal… READ MORE
13/07/2024 Bertus Preller Artificial fertilisation, Best Interests of the Child, Child Maintenance, Children, Guardianship, Life Partnerships, Parental Rights, Same Sex Couples 2024 ZAGPJHC 626, A.V and Another v D.C, artificial fertilisation, AV and NZ, best interests of the child principle, Child's Best Interests, children's act, co-parenting, Constitutional Court, Contact rights, custody disputes, DC, family advocate report, Family Law, family law practitioners, guardianship, identity and birth certificate, international travel consent, judicial decision, Legal Framework, legal precedent, maintenance payments, medical aid dispute, Parental Rights, permanent life partner, Section 21, Section 23, Section 40, South African Law, VJV case Case on Same-Sex Couples and Artificial Fertilisation: A.V and Another v D.C and Others (40522/19) [2024] ZAGPJHC 626 (26 June 2024) – Balancing Parental Rights and Child’s Best Interests Introduction In A.V and Another v D.C and Others (40522/19) ZAGPJHC 626 (26 June 2024), the applicants, AV and NZ, and the first respondent, DC, initially believed that certain sections… READ MORE
12/07/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Grandparents Rights, Guardianship, Parental Rights appellate interference, best interests of child, Children’s Court, children's act, Contact rights, court order, Family Advocate, Family Law, fraud, grandparental rights, High Court Judgment, K.R.S v C.L, legal principles, mistake, Parental Rights, rescission application, Section 23 application, settlement agreement, South Africa, void ab initio Grandparent Rights Upheld: High Court Rejects Father’s Bid to Rescind Contact Order in K.R.S v C.L (A186/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 627(21 June 2024). Background: The Children's Court Order and Family Dynamics The case of K.R.S v C.L (A186/2023) ZAGPPHC 627 stems from a complex family dispute involving a father, his children's maternal grandmother,… READ MORE