13/07/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Child protection, Children, Children's Court, Conduct of Childcare Experts, constitutional rights of children, Family reunification, Foster care, Grandparents Rights, Kinship care, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Section 28 Constitution 4 July 2025, best interests of the child South Africa, Cape Town High Court, care and contact orders, child custody South Africa, child protection, child removal South Africa, child witness protection, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Children’s Court appeal, constitutional rights of children, Dr Astrid Martalas, ex parte court orders, family law South Africa, family reunification judgment, foster care legal challenge, High Court appeal 2025, kinship care, legal precedent family law, legal safeguards in child care, Magistrate Sipoyo judgment, no-contact order South Africa, Parental Rights, procedural fairness South Africa, psychological harm attachment, Rule of Law family matters, S.E.T and Others v Department of Justice, Section 28 Constitution, ZAWCHC 282 “Torn Apart Without Cause”: High Court Slams Children’s Court in S.E.T and Others v Department of Justice and Another (A83/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 282 (4 July 2025). The Factual Matrix: Arrests, Allegations and the Path to Atlantis Court This matter originated in deeply troubling circumstances involving two minor children, a six-year-old girl (X) and a one-year-old boy… READ MORE
29/06/2025 Bertus Preller Abuse of Process, Alienation, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Children's Court, Costs, Divorce, Family Advocate, Joint Decision Making, Maintenance, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance, Variation Rule 43(6) B.P.M v J.L.M, best interests of the child, child contact, co-parenting, Colman v Colman, Contact rights, custody variation, divorce litigation, Du Preez v Du Preez, Family Advocate, family advocate report, family law South Africa, forensic psychologist, High Court Limpopo, interim maintenance, Mangena AJ, parental alienation, parenting plans, PAS, Rule 43 Application, Rule 43(6), shared residency, Soller v G, South African divorce law, spousal maintenance, spousal support South Africa, Variation Application, Visser v Visser, ZALMPPHC 96 Parental Alienation, Prolixity and the Best Interests Principle in B.P.M v J.L.M (1909/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 96 (13 May 2025). Background and Factual Matrix of the Rule 43(6) Dispute The matter before the court in B.P.M v J.L.M (1909/2024) ZALMPPHC 96 (13 May 2025) concerned a Rule 43(6) application brought… READ MORE
29/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Child Bullying, Children, Children's Court, Costs, Curator Ad Litem, Divorce, Guardianship, Joint Decision Making, Maintenance, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance A.W.F v K.S.R, best interests of the child, blended family parental rights, care of minor children, child maintenance South Africa, Children’s Act sections 23 and 24, contested divorce interim relief, curator ad litem, divorce maintenance case, family law judgment, financial disclosure form, financial obligations in divorce, High Court Pretoria, High Court Rule 43 order, interim contact orders, interim divorce relief, Johannesburg family law, legal rights of stepparents, Parental Responsibilities, pendente lite maintenance, racial allegations in custody, Rule 43 legal principles, Rule 43 South Africa, shared custody rights, sibling bond divorce, spousal maintenance application, urgent contact disputes, vulnerable spouse, ZAGPPHC 503 Parental Rights, Spousal Support, and Racial Allegations: Inside A.W.F v K.S.R (052216/2024) [2025] ZAGPPHC 503 (16 May 2025) and the Rule 43 Balancing Act. The Factual Matrix: Disputed Care, Contact, and Maintenance in a Rule 43 Application In A.W.F v K.S.R (052216/2024) ZAGPPHC 503 (16 May 2025), the applicant approached the Gauteng Division of… READ MORE
25/06/2025 Bertus Preller anti-dissipatory relief, Arrears, Best Interests of the Child, Child Maintenance, Children, Children's Court, Divorce, Maintenance, Maintenance Court, Preservation Order anti-dissipation interdict, best interests of child, child maintenance, court amendment powers, divorce settlement agreements, finality principle, financial disclosure, future maintenance, High Court jurisdiction, Maintenance Act 99 of 1998, maintenance arrears, maintenance obligations, parental support duties, preservation orders, property sale proceeds, reciprocal parental duties, Regional Court orders, rule 42 uniform rules, Section 28 Constitution, sectional title property, shared responsibility, South African Family Law, trust account preservation, unemployment maintenance, upper guardian, Western Cape High Court, ZAWCHC When Courts Will Preserve Property Sale Proceeds for Child Maintenance: D.D.B v T.D.B and Another (2025/073213) [2025] ZAWCHC 250 (19 June 2025). Establishes Shared Parental Responsibility. Key Takeaways This Western Cape High Court judgment establishes several crucial principles for family law practitioners and divorced parents navigating maintenance disputes. Courts will only grant preservation orders for future… READ MORE
24/06/2025 Bertus Preller Abduction, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Contempt of Court, Costs, Habitual Residence, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Holiday Travel, Immigration, International Divorce, International Family Law, International Travel, Joint Decision Making, Parental Alienation, Parental Rights, Punitive Cost Orders, Relocation attorney and client scale, best interests of children, care and contact assessment, child abduction, child custody orders, contempt of court, contempt proceedings urgency, cross-border custody disputes, cross-border litigation, divorce proceedings, Easter holiday dispute, emergency passports, family court jurisdiction, Hague Convention, hearsay evidence, international child retention, international enforcement, judicial authority vindication, Jurisdictional Challenges, mala fides presumption, postponement applications, punitive costs, sine die postponement, South African Family Law, suspended imprisonment, Swiss courts, travel documentation, Western Cape High Court, wilful non-compliance When Easter Holidays Turn Into International Child Retention: T.A.M-W v C.M.M (2025/030666) [2025] ZAWCHC 217 (23 May 2025) and the Limits of Cross-Border Contempt Orders. Key Takeaways This landmark judgment demonstrates that South African courts will not hesitate to use their full arsenal of sanctions when parties deliberately flout agreed court orders, particularly where children's… READ MORE
16/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Guardianship, Parental Rights Acting Judge Van Niekerk, alternative remedies family disputes, best interests child principle, child welfare protection, child-centric legal decisions, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, constitutional children's rights, current evidence requirement, evidentiary threshold family law, family law jurisprudence, forensic evaluation children, guardianship rights suspension, High Court Gauteng Division, legal practitioners guidance, logistical challenges custody, parental cooperation disputes, parental guardianship termination, parental responsibilities termination, passport application disputes, play therapy authorization, procedural delays parental rights, proportionality termination relief, reasonableness standard parental conduct, Section 28 parental rights, South African Family Law, stale evidence family court, temporal relevance custody matters, unopposed family applications When Good Intentions Meet Legal Reality: Y.T.B v J.F.B [2025] ZAGPPHC 494 (16 May 2025) – High Court Rejects Termination of Parental Rights Over Stale Cooperation Complaints. Summary The High Court's decision in Y.T.B v J.F.B represents a significant affirmation of the stringent evidentiary requirements for terminating parental guardianship rights under the Children's Act. The judgment underscores… READ MORE
15/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Birth certificate amendment, Children, Children born outside marriage, DNA testing, Paternity confirmation administrative justice, BADRA, best interests of child, birth certificate amendment, birth registration, Births and Deaths Registration Act, Centre for Child Law, children born outside marriage, children's rights, Constitutional Rights, deportation interdict, dignity rights, DNA testing, family law South Africa, family recognition, High Court paternity, immigration law, legal precedent, maternal consent, PAJA, Parental Rights, paternity confirmation, permanent residence, population register, section 11(5), unmarried fathers, Western Cape High Court DNA Not Required: High Court Rules Fathers Don’t Need Genetic Testing After Paternity Confirmed – V.K and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (21886/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 219 (26 May 2025). The Facts: A Father's Fight for Recognition This case centers on V.K., a Zambian citizen who entered South Africa on a visitor's visa, and his South African partner S.M. The… READ MORE
15/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Children's Court, Costs, Holiday Travel, Parental Rights, Procedure, Reunification, Temporary Safe Care AC Cilliers Law of Costs, best interests principle, biological father access, child access rights, child custody disputes, children's court authority, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, Christmas access disputes, costs in family matters, D.G.S.F v M.F case, emotional psychological problems children, family law South Africa, foster care arrangements, Free State High Court, gradual reunification, High Court jurisdiction, leave of absence children, legal costs children matters, magistrate's court jurisdiction, procedural failures, reunification process, section 168 Children's Act, section 187 Children's Act, section 46 Children's Act, social worker reports, temporary safe care, upper guardianship powers, urgent applications, Van Zyl J Father’s Festive Season Bid Fails: High Court Lacks Jurisdiction in Children’s Court Matters – JHG v GWH and Another (7147/2024) [2025] ZAFSHC 133 (7 May 2025). Case Overview: JHG v GWH and Another In the matter of JHG v GWH and Another (7147/2024) ZAFSHC 133 (7 May 2025), the High Court of South Africa, Free State… READ MORE
10/06/2025 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Conduct of Childcare Experts, Divorce, Guardianship, International Travel, Maintenance, Muslim Marriages, Parental Coordinator, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Relocation best interests of child, child psychology relocation, child relocation South Africa, Children’s Act 38 of 2005, constitutional family law, contact arrangements international, cross-border parenting, custodial parent rights, divorce relocation orders, expert witness family law, F v F constitutional rights, Family Advocate reports, family law South Africa, freedom of movement parents, gender discrimination family law, gender equality family court, international custody disputes, international relocation disputes, Jackson v Jackson precedent, KwaZulu-Natal High Court, maintenance obligations relocation, mirror orders international, non-custodial parent contact, parental alienation allegations, parental consent relocation, passport consent children, Portugal relocation case, primary caregiver rights, visa requirements minors Breaking the Shackles: How W.S v N.V (D376/2020; D1062/2021) [2025] ZAKZDHC 35 (6 June 2025) Transformed South African Child Relocation Law and Gender Rights. The Facts: A Family Torn Between Two Continents This case presents a deeply personal yet legally complex dispute that unfolded over several years, illustrating the profound challenges faced by divorced… READ MORE
28/05/2025 Bertus Preller Arrears, Children, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Islamic Law, Maintenance, Muslim Marriages, Punitive Cost Orders, Rule 43 Acting Judge Van Zyl, attorney client costs, blameworthy conduct, child maintenance, child support enforcement, contempt of court, Contempt Proceedings, curator ad litem, family court orders, family law contempt, family law enforcement, maintenance arrears, maintenance contempt, maintenance default, maintenance defaulters, maintenance enforcement, maintenance obligations, maintenance variation applications, mala fides, periodical imprisonment, punitive costs orders, rental obligations, Rule 43 maintenance, Rule 43 orders, South African Family Law, Suspended Sentence, weekend imprisonment, Western Cape High Court, wilful non-compliance Contempt of Court for Maintenance Default: Weekend Imprisonment and Punitive Costs in S.L v A.C (2024/143281) [2025] ZAWCHC 212 (21 May 2025). Facts The parties were married on 27 April 2009 under Shariah law and have two minor children. Their civil marriage still subsisted, albeit described by Acting Judge Van Zyl as… READ MORE