30/11/2024 Bertus Preller Anti-Dissipation Interdicts, anti-dissipatory relief, Division of Estate, Divorce, In Community of Property, Interdict, Procedural Law, Procedure Attorney Conduct, auction process, civil procedure, conveyancing, court order, divorce agreement, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement, execution debtor, execution sale, High Court Judgment, judicial fairness, judicial interpretation, judicial oversight, Legal Ethics, legal fairness, legal precedent, market value, matrimonial assets, matrimonial property, procedural fairness, property auction, property dispute, property law, property rights, property rights protection, Property Transfer, Property Valuation, sale in execution, Sheriff's sale, South African Law From R1.5 Million to R1000: How a Divorce Property Sale Went Terribly Wrong – M.R.M v M.F.M and Others (M614/2023) [2024] ZANWHC 289 (26 November 2024). In what could be dubbed "The Case of the Thousand Rand Mansion," the North West High Court recently had to grapple with a property sale that would make any estate… READ MORE
09/02/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance assessment of financial needs, clean hands doctrine, court discretion, disclosing financial information, divorce court orders, divorce financial obligations, divorce proceedings, equitable relief, financial deceit in divorce, financial disclosure, financial transparency, honesty in legal proceedings, inheritance disclosure, interim maintenance, interim relief, judicial fairness, legal costs in divorce, Legal Ethics, legal obligations in divorce, legal strategies in divorce, maintenance orders, Marital Assets, marital financial disputes, NZIWENI J, Rule 43 applications, savings disclosure, South African Family Law, spousal support, striking applications, transparency in divorce, Uniform Rules of Court Unlocking Fairness in Divorce: The Critical Role of Full Disclosure in Rule 43 Applications. – C.A v H.A (5578/2022) [2024] ZAWCHC 25 (6 February 2024). Introduction In the case of C.A vs. H.A, brought under Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules of Court, the applicant sought interim maintenance for herself while awaiting the finalisation of… READ MORE
05/02/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Children, Costs, Divorce, Parental Rights, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance bonding therapy, child best interests, child care, Child Custody, Children's Welfare, contact arrangements, contribution to costs, court order, court rulings Rule 43, divorce proceedings, Family Court, family dynamics, Family Law, family law analysis, family law disputes, financial responsibilities, forensic assessment, interim maintenance, judicial fairness, Legal Analysis, legal contributions, Legal Costs, Legal proceedings, legal strategies, maintenance contribution, Parental Responsibilities, Parental Rights, primary residence, South African Family Law, T E v V E, Von Ludwig AJ Navigating Family Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Rule 43 Application. – T E v V E (2023/021747) [2024] ZAGPJHC 94 (2 February 2024). Introduction: The Complexity of Rule 43 Applications Rule 43 applications serve as a pivotal yet challenging facet of divorce proceedings, offering a singular affidavit to each litigant to encapsulate a… READ MORE