20/12/2023 Bertus Preller Children, Divorce, Guardianship, Parental Rights Child Custody, Children's Best Interests, Constitutional Rights, Court Decisions, Court Orders, divorce proceedings, Family Court, Family Law, Family Law Judgements, Jurisdictional Challenges, Legal Balancing Act, legal case analysis, Legal Costs, Legal Discretion, Legal Ethics, Legal Insights, Legal precedents, Medical Records Disclosure, Parental Duties, Parental Rights, Privacy Rights, Privacy vs Best Interests, South Africa, Therapy Confidentiality, W.B v R.B Balancing Privacy and Children’s Best Interests: Insights from W.B v R.B and Another (D8141/2022) [2023] ZAKZDHC 96 (18 December 2023). Introduction In the case of W.B v R.B and Another, presided over by Henriques J, the court faced a complex interlocutory application. This case, filed under case number D8141/2022 and… READ MORE
21/11/2023 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Alimony, Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance Affidavit Analysis, Attorney Conduct, child maintenance, Condonation, Constitutional Challenges, Court Rulings, divorce proceedings, Family Law, financial disclosure, interim relief, Legal Ethics, Legal precedents, Legal Procedure, Litigation Tactics, maintenance pendente lite, Procedural Compliance, Prolixity in Affidavits, Rule 30 Challenge, Rule 43 Application, South African High Court Navigating the Complex Waters of Financial Disclosure in Rule 43 Applications and Legal Ethics: A Closer Look at a Landmark Ruling and the Conduct of the Respondent’s Attorney. I P v N P ; In re: N P v I P (16768/2023) ZAWCHC 170 (20 November 2023) Analysis of Rule 30 and Rule 43 Applications Overview of the… READ MORE
24/10/2023 Bertus Preller Children, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Parental Rights, Rule 43, Views of the Child Bertus Preller, Child Custody, Court Decisions, Divorce Attorney Cape Town, Divorce Attorney South Africa, divorce proceedings, Family Law, Family Lawyers, financial disclosure, High Court, Legal Costs, Legal Diligence, Legal Ethics, legal implications, legal precedent, Legal Procedures, Legal Requirements, maintenance pendente lite, Minor Children, Office of the Family Advocate, Parental Responsibilities, Practice Directives, Rule 43, South Africa, views of the child Setting the Standard: A Comprehensive High Court Judgment on Family Law That Redefines Attorney Conduct and The Views of the Child. C.T v T.E.T (9685/2022) ZAWCHC 262 (13 October 2023) Court and Case Details The case was heard in the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division, Cape Town, presided… READ MORE