09/02/2024 Bertus Preller Costs, Division of Estate, Divorce, In Community of Property, International Divorce, International Divorce, Liquidator, Marital Regimes, Procedural Law Antenuptial Contract, Bertus Preller, cross-border marriage, divorce proceedings, expert evidence, F. Bezuidenhout AJ, financial disclosure, foreign marriage, full disclosure, immediate division, international private law, landmark case, legal precedent, legal principles, Lex Domicilii Matrimonii, matrimonial consequences, matrimonial disputes, matrimonial domicile, matrimonial law, matrimonial property, Matrimonial Property Act, MPA, new case, new judgement, procedural law, Rule 36(9), Rule 43 applications, South African Law, Substantive Law Deciphering L.E v L.A (1884/2018) [2024] ZAGPJHC 104 (9 February 2024): A Landmark Case on Foreign Marriages and South African Property Law. – 9 February 2024. Introduction to the Case In a landmark decision that navigates the intersection of matrimonial law and international private law, the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, was presented… READ MORE
01/02/2024 Bertus Preller Customary Marriages constitutional values, cultural diversity, cultural practices, customary law, customary marriages, dignity, equality, estate administration, estate executrix, Family Law, inheritance, judicial decisions, Khashane v Minister of Home Affairs, legal challenges, Legal Framework, legal interpretation, legal precedent, Legal Procedures, Legal Protection, legal recognition, lobola negotiations, marital rights, marriage registration, posthumous registration, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, South African Law, spousal rights, surviving spouse rights, traditional marriages Securing Rights Beyond Life: The Landmark Case for Posthumous Registration of Customary Marriages in South Africa. – Khashane v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (052246/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 3 (12 January 2024). Introduction to the Application for Posthumous Registration of a Customary Marriage In the case of Khashane v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (052246/2023) ZAGPPHC 3 (12 January 2024), the… READ MORE
25/01/2024 Bertus Preller Children, Parental Rights, Relocation 2023 court ruling, best interests of the child, child custody law, Child Relocation, child welfare, child's psychological well-being, court judgment, custody dispute, D.J.H. v A.H, divorce proceedings, Eastern Cape High Court, family advocate report, family law implications, family law judgments, family law precedent, judicial scrutiny, Legal Analysis, legal arguments, legal case review, legal precedent, legal reasoning, Parental Responsibilities, Parental Rights, relocation case study, relocation impact, relocation jurisprudence, relocation opposition, South African Family Law, South African jurisprudence Navigating the Tides of Change: The Intricacies of Child Relocation in D.J.H. v A.H (914/2023) [2023] ZAECMKHC 139, (12 December 2023). – Rugunanan J. Overview of the D.J.H. v A.H Relocation Dispute In the case D.J.H. v A.H (914/2023) ZAECMKHC 139, the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court grappled with a contentious child… READ MORE
19/01/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Children, Parental Rights, Relocation Child Custody, child maintenance, child welfare, Child's Best Interests, children's act, Constitutional Rights, court judgement, custodial parent rights, family advocate report, family court decision, Family Law, family law practice, international child relocation, international family law, International Relocation, Johannesburg High Court, landmark ruling, Legal Analysis, legal precedent, MAHOMED AJ, new case on child relocation, non-custodial parent, parent-child relationship, parental consent, Parental Responsibilities, relocation consent, relocation rights, South African legal system, T.R v S.M Shaping the Future of Family Law: A Pivotal South African Case on Child Relocation – T.R v S.M (035901/2023) [2024] ZAGPJHC 35 (17 January 2024). Facts of the Case Background Parties and Relationship: From 2009 to 2012, T.R (the applicant) and S.M (the respondent) were in a relationship but never married. They had a daughter… READ MORE
11/01/2024 Bertus Preller Divorce, In Community of Property, Non-Patrimonial Assets Asset Division, community property, constitutional law, discrimination in marriage, divorce settlements, Family Law, joint estate, legal implications, legal interpretation, legal precedent, legal reform, LH v ZH case, marriage in community of property, marriage law, matrimonial assets, matrimonial property law, matrimonial property regimes, non-patrimonial damages, pre-marital assets, Section 18(a) MPA, South Africa, spousal rights, Supreme Court of Appeal Navigating Matrimonial Property Rights: Insights from the LH v ZH Case – LH v ZH (2022) 1 SA 384 (SCA). OVERVIEW OF THE LH V ZH CASE AND MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA The case of LH v ZH (2022) 1 SA 384 (SCA) presents a pivotal moment in… READ MORE
10/01/2024 Bertus Preller Abuse, Adversarial Legal System, Divorce, Forfeiture of Benefits, Pension Funds, Reasons for Dicorce asset allocation, asset forfeiture, community of property, conduct in marriage, divorce assets division, Divorce Law, divorce settlements, emotional abuse, equitable distribution, family court decisions, financial neglect, High Court ruling, legal implications, legal judgment, legal precedent, marital breakdown, marital contributions, marital misconduct, matrimonial property, pension fund interest, property rights, South African Family Law, spousal behaviour, Z v Z case Marriage Misconduct and Asset Forfeiture: A Pivotal Ruling in Z v Z (34253/2010) [2024] ZAGPJHC – 4 (10 January 2024). Case Overview In the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, the case of Z v Z (Case No: 34253/2010) was presided over by Adams J. The judgment, delivered… READ MORE
10/01/2024 Bertus Preller Divorce, Separation Applications Asset Division, court decision, divorce case study, divorce ruling, fair judgement, Family Law, financial disclosure in divorce, High Court ruling, Judge Thulare, Legal Analysis, legal precedent, Legal proceedings, legal strategy in divorce, matrimonial dispute, matrimonial law, matrimonial relief, Rule 33(4), Rule 43, separation application, South African Law, spousal maintenance, Uniform Rules of Court, urgent divorce application Judge Thulare’s Insightful Ruling on a Separation Application and Fairness in M.V v E.V (nee VS) [2023] ZAWCHC 330 – Divorce Case. – (14 December 2023). BACKGROUND Marriage and Family: The parties, M.V (applicant) and E.V (respondent), were married on 21 October 1995 under an antenuptial contract excluding the accrual system. They had two children, with… READ MORE
20/12/2023 Bertus Preller Antenuptial Contracts, Customary Law, Divorce ante-nuptial contract, civil law, community of property, consent in marriage, court judgment, customary law., customary marriage, Divorce Law, Family Law, High Court ruling, Legal Analysis, legal challenges, legal dispute, legal implications, legal precedent, marital regime, marriage registration, Mashisane v Mhlauli, matrimonial consent, matrimonial property, property rights, RCMA, South African Law, Supreme Court appeal, traditional customs Deciphering Customary vs Civil Marriage in South African Law: An In-Depth Look at Mashisane v Mhlauli (903/2022) [2023] ZASCA 176 (14 December 2023). Court Composition and Hearing The case of Mashisane v Mhlauli was heard by the Supreme Court of Appeal on 8 November 2023, presided over by Justices Mbatha, Mothle, Hughes, Weiner,… READ MORE
18/12/2023 Bertus Preller Life Partnerships, Universal Partnership cohabitation rights, estate disputes, estate management, estate rights, Family Law, inheritance law, joint asset ownership, landmark judgment, legal case analysis, legal precedent, legal recognition, LL v CH N.O., non-marital relationships, partnership outside marriage, property sharing, relationship law, South Africa High Court, South African Law, universal partnership Unveiling the Invisible Ties: How a Landmark Case Redefined Universal Partnerships in South Africa. – L.L v C.H NO and Others (A018010/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1440 (12 December 2023). Introduction In the case involving LL (Appellant) and CH N.O. (First Respondent) among others, the central issue revolved around the existence of a universal partnership between LL and the late… READ MORE
29/11/2023 Bertus Preller Children, Guardianship, Parental Rights, Relocation Article 13(b), child best interests, Child Custody, child protection, child return, child welfare, Constitutional Court, cross-border custody, Family Court, Family Law, Hague Convention, international abduction, international law, legal interpretation, legal judgement, legal precedent, Parental Rights, psychological harm, South Africa, UK Constitutional Court’s Insightful Interpretation of the Hague Convention’s Article 13(b) in a Pivotal International Child Custody Case – Ad Hoc Central Authority for RSA and Another v Heidi Nicole Koch N.O. and Another [2023] ZACC 37. FACTS This case involves a complex international child custody dispute under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Here is a summary of the key facts:… READ MORE