28/06/2025 Bertus Preller Actio communi dividundo, Customary Law, Customary Marriages, Divorce, In Community of Property, Marriage, Urgency actio communi dividundo, balance convenience equity, co-ownership disputes, community of property marriage, compelling spouse sell property, creditor action property, customary marriage property rights, divorce proceedings pending, foreclosure prevention, irreparable harm property, Johannesburg High Court, joint estate protection, lis pendens matrimonial matters, matrimonial deadlock, Matrimonial Property Act, matrimonial property disputes, minor children interests, property law South Africa, property sale court order, recognition customary marriage act, section 16 matrimonial property act, self representation matrimonial disputes, sheriff authorisation documents, South African Family Law, spousal consent immovable property, trust arrangements divorce proceedings, unreasonable withholding consent, urgency property matters When One Spouse Won’t Sell: Court Compels Property Sale to Prevent Foreclosure in I.M.R v N.M.D (2024/014513) [2025] ZAGPJHC (5 May 2025). Background: A Customary Marriage in Crisis and Property Under Threat The case of I.M.R v N.M.D presents a stark illustration of how matrimonial breakdown can threaten jointly owned property, particularly… READ MORE
03/04/2024 Bertus Preller Contempt of Court, Divorce, Settlement agreements, Trusts, Trusts accountability, Asset Division, beneficiary interests, compliance, contempt of court, court judgment, divorce order, divorce settlement, duty, Family Law, fiduciary responsibility, Johannesburg High Court, joint action, legal obligations, Legal proceedings, legal remedy, M.F v V.F case, Property Division, property sale, settlement agreement, South African trust law, trust administration, Trust assets, trust deed, trust law, trust management, trust property, trustee conduct, trustees Duties of Trustees Unveiled: Insights from the M.F v V.F Case Analysis – M.F v V.F and Others (2003/22202) [2024] ZAGPJHC 318 (2 April 2024). The Facts Mr. M F (the applicant) and Mrs. V F (the first respondent) were married until their divorce on 15 July 2005. The divorce order incorporated a settlement agreement,… READ MORE
19/01/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Children, Parental Rights, Relocation Child Custody, child maintenance, child welfare, Child's Best Interests, children's act, Constitutional Rights, court judgement, custodial parent rights, family advocate report, family court decision, Family Law, family law practice, international child relocation, international family law, International Relocation, Johannesburg High Court, landmark ruling, Legal Analysis, legal precedent, MAHOMED AJ, new case on child relocation, non-custodial parent, parent-child relationship, parental consent, Parental Responsibilities, relocation consent, relocation rights, South African legal system, T.R v S.M Shaping the Future of Family Law: A Pivotal South African Case on Child Relocation – T.R v S.M (035901/2023) [2024] ZAGPJHC 35 (17 January 2024). Facts of the Case Background Parties and Relationship: From 2009 to 2012, T.R (the applicant) and S.M (the respondent) were in a relationship but never married. They had a daughter… READ MORE