13/08/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Family Law Court System South Africa, Grandparents Rights, Mediation, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Urgency, Views of the Child Alternative Dispute Resolution, bereavement, best interests of the child, child access, Child Custody, child law, child welfare, children's act, Court Procedures, extended family rights, Family Court, family disputes, Family Law, family relationships, grandparents' rights, Judicial Discretion, legal delay, legal precedent, Legal Procedures, legal urgency, Mediation, parental death, procedural requirements, Self-Created Urgency, South African Law, Urgent Application, urgent court roll, Western Cape High Court Urgency Dismissed in Grandparents’ Access Case: E.S and Others v P.S and Another (16138/24) [2024] ZAWCHC 201 (12 August 2024). Background: A Family's Struggle for Contact After Tragedy In the heart-wrenching case of E.S and Others v P.S and Another (16138/24) ZAWCHC 201 (12 August 2024), the Western Cape High… READ MORE
18/07/2024 Bertus Preller Best Interests of the Child, Children, Costs, Parental Rights, Procedure, Rule 43 abuse of process, best interests of the child, Child Custody, child welfare, Constitutional Rights, divorce proceedings, Family Law, forum shopping, High Court, interim orders, Judicial Discretion, Legal Procedure, Legal Strategy, matrimonial matters, regional court, Rule 43, Rule 58, South African Law, urgency Navigating the Maze: Forum Shopping and Urgency in Family Law – Insights from D.G.S.F v M.F and Another (347/2024) [2024] ZAFSHC 207. Background: A High-Stakes Rule 43 Application The case of D.G.S.F v M.F and Another (347/2024) ZAFSHC 207 (2 July 2024) centres on a contentious Rule 43 application in the Free… READ MORE
22/06/2024 Bertus Preller Abduction, Best Interests of the Child, Children, Emotional Abuse, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Parental Rights, Procedural Law, Psychological Abuse, Relocation Article 13(b), best interests of child, Central Authority, child abduction, constitutional law, cross-border custody, developmental delays, evidentiary standards, grave risk exception, habitual residence, Hague Convention, international family law, international treaties, Judicial Discretion, post-partum depression, prompt return principle, Protective Measures, South Africa, Supreme Court of Appeal, undertakings Solomon’s Dilemma in the Digital Age: SCA Navigates International Child Abduction in C.A.R v Central Authority (737/2023) [2024] ZASCA 103 (21 June 2024). Background of the Case: What Led to the Supreme Court of Appeal? In the annals of legal history, cases involving child custody (care and contact) often evoke the wisdom of… READ MORE
21/06/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, In Community of Property, Maintenance, Spousal Maintenance Asset Division, clean break principle, costs award, court discretion, Divorce Act, divorce settlement, earning capacity, financial planning, financial security, financial vulnerability, Gender Equality, health considerations, holistic approach, Judicial Discretion, legal precedent, life-long maintenance, long-term marriage, Marital Assets, medical aid, pension benefits, permanent maintenance, post-divorce living standards, procedural flexibility, quality of life, rehabilitative maintenance, retirement funds, South African divorce law, spousal support, witness credibility Life-Long Spousal Maintenance Upheld: M.T v E.T (8197/2018) [2024] ZAGPJHC 578 (20 June 2024). Background: A 28-Year Marriage Comes to an End The case of M.T v E.T (8197/2018) ZAGPJHC 578 (20 June 2024) presents a moving tale of a long-term marriage's dissolution and… READ MORE
23/05/2024 Bertus Preller Divorce, Maintenance, Marriage, Pacta sunt servanda, Prenuptial Afreement Antenuptial Contract, certainty, circumvention, Constitutional Court, D H B v C S B, dissenting opinion, Divorce, Divorce Act, donation, enforceability, fairness, freedom of contract, Judicial Discretion, jurisdiction, legal status, maintenance contract, majority judgment, matrimonial regime, Pacta Sunt Servanda, pleadings, prenuptial agreements, procedural fairness, Public Policy, Section 7, spousal maintenance, statutory right, unintended consequences Prenuptial Agreements and Public Policy: The Constitutional Court’s Ruling in D H B v C S B (CCT 293/22) [2024] ZACC 9 (22 May 2024). Background of the Case D H B and C S B concluded an antenuptial contract before their marriage in 2015, declaring their marriage to be out of community of property… READ MORE
27/04/2024 Bertus Preller Accrual Calculation, Divorce, Hiding Assets, Marital Regimes, Trusts, Trusts accrual system, alter ego, asset protection, Badenhorst v Badenhorst, best interests of children, Constitution, Divorce, economic inequality, equality, estate planning, fact-specific enquiry, gender, Judicial Discretion, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, piercing the trust veneer, RP v DP, sections 9 and 28, sham trust, substantive equality, transformative constitutionalism, trusts, unfair discrimination, Van Zyl v Kaye Piercing the Trust Veneer in Divorce: A Constitutional Approach to Achieving Equity (Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984; Badenhorst v Badenhorst 2006 (2) SA 255 (SCA); RP v DP 2014 (6) SA 243 (ECP)). Introduction The accrual system, as set out in the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 (hereafter referred to as the MPA), is a matrimonial property regime that aims to recognise… READ MORE
01/03/2024 Bertus Preller Abduction, Children, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Parental Rights, Relocation, Views of the Child child custody law, child protection law, child welfare, Children's Best Interests, consent and acquiescence, cross-border family law, custody rights, Family Law, Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, international custody battle, Judicial Discretion, Justice Cloete, Legal Analysis, legal decision-making, legal fairness, Legal Jurisdiction, legal precedent, legal proceedings costs, MB v LC and Another, parental disputes, Plascon-Evans rule, South Africa legal system, wrongful retention Justice Prevails: Navigating International Child Abduction Law with Precision and Compassion. – MB v LC and Another (21586/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 61 (29 February 2024). Introduction and Background The case adjudicated by Justice J Cloete, delves into a dispute under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. This matter revolves around… READ MORE
12/01/2024 Bertus Preller Costs, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions A.F v M.F, Case Law, constitutional principles, contribution quantum, divorce litigation, Equality of Arms, EVG v AJJV, fairness in divorce, Family Law, financial disparity, gender dynamics, interim maintenance, J.K v E.S.K, Judicial Discretion, L.B v D.F.B, Legal Costs, legal expenses, Legal Representation, matrimonial disputes, matrimonial support, past legal costs, Rule 43, South African Law, technological advancements Understanding Rule 43: The Framework for Legal Cost Contributions in Divorce Litigation. INTRODUCTION In the realm of matrimonial law, Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules of Court stands as a pivotal mechanism, designed to address the financial imbalances that often arise during… READ MORE
03/12/2023 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance attorney divorce, child support, contribution to costs rule 43, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement, equal representation, Family Court, Family Law, financial dependency, financial disparity, Financial Obligations, forensic accountant, gendered maintenance system, interim maintenance, Judicial Discretion, Legal Costs, legal fees contribution, Legal Representation, maintenance claims., marital standard of living, matrimonial litigation, Ozzy Osbourne reference, Rule 43 proceedings, South African divorce, spousal maintenance, urgent applications Legal Drama Meets Rock ‘n’ Roll: PILLAY AJ’s Ruling against Attorney/Respondent in a Rule 43 application with an Ozzy Osbourne Twist – J K v E K (15912/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 182 (29 November 2023) Background of the Case Marriage and Separation Details: The parties were married on 1 December 2012, with their marriage being out of community of property and incorporating the accrual system.… READ MORE
01/12/2023 Bertus Preller Children, Divorce Court Applications, Court Decisions, Divorce Cases, Divorce Law, divorce litigation, divorce proceedings, Divorce Trials, Expedient Resolution, Fair Legal Process, Family Court, Judicial Discretion, Legal Issues, Legal proceedings, Legal Separation, Legal Separation Process, matrimonial law, Rule 33(4), Separation Applications, South African Law, Uniform Rules of Court Understanding Separation Applications in Divorce Proceedings: Navigating Rule 33(4) of the Uniform Rules of Court – M.D.A.P.G.S v L.M.D.S (2021/47489) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1373 (24 November 2023). In a recent judgment, the court addressed an interlocutory application concerning a divorce case in South Africa. The application, based on rule 33(4) of the Uniform Rules of Court, sought… READ MORE