22/01/2026 Bertus Preller Antenuptial Contracts, Antenuptial Contracts, Black Coffee, Black women property rights, Constitutional Court customary law, Constitutional law, Customary Law, Customary marriage dissolution, Customary marriage requirements, Customary Marriages, Divorce, Divorce summons South Africa, EB v ER Constitutional Court, In Community of Property, matrimonial asset division, Matrimonial Properties Act, Matrimonial property forfeiture, Out of community of property, Procedural Law, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Section 8 RCMA, Section 10(2) Antenuptial Contracts, black women property rights, civil marriages, community of property, Constitutional Court judgment, constitutional invalidity, creditor protection, customary law, customary marriages, Deeds Registries Act, dissenting judgment, family law South Africa, Gumede case, joint estate, judicial oversight, Majiedt J, marriage conversion, Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, Matrimonial Property Regime, out of community of property, postnuptial contracts, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998, Rogers J, section 10(2), section 21 MPA, section 25 Constitution, section 7(2) Recognition Act, section 9 Constitution, spousal property rights, VVC v JRM The Antenuptial Contract Controversy: VVC v JRM and Others [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) and the Constitutional Court’s Divided Stance on Customary-to-Civil Marriage Conversions. Factual Matrix: From Customary Union to Civil Marriage and the Antenuptial Contract Conundrum The applicant, VVC, and the first respondent, JRM, entered into a customary marriage on 5 August 2011.… READ MORE
03/07/2025 Bertus Preller Customary Law, Customary marriage requirements, Customary Marriages, Marriage registration, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Section 8 RCMA, Traditional marriage validity accrual system, African marriage, ante-nuptial contract, civil law, civil marriage, community of property, cultural marriage, customary law, customary marriage, Deeds Office, Family Law, legal concessions, Limpopo High Court, lobola, marital property, Marriage Act, marriage certificate, marriage disputes, marriage regimes, marriage validity, matrimonial law, matrimonial regimes, Property Division, Recognition of Customary Marriage Act, Rule 33, spousal property rights, stated case, traditional marriage, wedding ceremonies When Spouses Cannot Agree on Their Marriage Regime: L.M.P v N.J.D.P (Appeal) (HCAA33/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 122 (19 June 2025) and the Impossibility of Concurrent Matrimonial Systems. Factual Matrix: When Spouses Disagree on Their Marriage Regime The dispute in this matter exemplifies a peculiar but increasingly common phenomenon in South African family law where spouses find themselves… READ MORE