03/07/2025 Bertus Preller Customary Law, Customary marriage requirements, Customary Marriages, Marriage registration, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Section 8 RCMA, Traditional marriage validity accrual system, African marriage, ante-nuptial contract, civil law, civil marriage, community of property, cultural marriage, customary law, customary marriage, Deeds Office, Family Law, legal concessions, Limpopo High Court, lobola, marital property, Marriage Act, marriage certificate, marriage disputes, marriage regimes, marriage validity, matrimonial law, matrimonial regimes, Property Division, Recognition of Customary Marriage Act, Rule 33, spousal property rights, stated case, traditional marriage, wedding ceremonies When Spouses Cannot Agree on Their Marriage Regime: L.M.P v N.J.D.P (Appeal) (HCAA33/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 122 (19 June 2025) and the Impossibility of Concurrent Matrimonial Systems. Factual Matrix: When Spouses Disagree on Their Marriage Regime The dispute in this matter exemplifies a peculiar but increasingly common phenomenon in South African family law where spouses find themselves… READ MORE
03/07/2025 Bertus Preller Bigamy, Constitutional Court customary law, Customary Law, Customary marriage dissolution, Customary marriage requirements, Customary Marriages, First wife consent, Mayelane precedent, Polygamous marriage, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Section 8 RCMA bigamy, civil marriage, competing marriage claims, Constitutional Court, Constitutional Rights, customary law, customary marriage, customary marriage requirements, Deputy Judge President Ratshibvumo, Divorce Decree, equality rights, estate disputes, first wife consent, human dignity, irretrievable breakdown, lobola, marriage registration, marriage validity, matrimonial property, Mayelane precedent, Mpumalanga High Court, polygamous marriage, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, South African Family Law, subsequent marriages, traditional marriage, widow status First Wife Consent Strikes Again: Constitutional Court’s Mayelane Precedent Upheld in N.R.M v F.N and Others (943/2023) [2025] ZAMPMBHC 53 (17 June 2025). The Factual Matrix: A Tale of Two Marriages and Competing Claims The factual backdrop to this matter presents a complex web of relationships that culminated in competing claims to marital… READ MORE
29/06/2025 Bertus Preller Cohabitation, Customary Marriages, Inheritance rights, Interdict, Intestate Succession, Procedure, South African succession law Administration of Estates Act, African customary law, attorney and client scale, cohabitation, customary law marriage, customary marriage, estate administration, estate dispute, estate litigation, estate preservation, executor appointment, High Court Pretoria, inheritance dispute, interim interdict, intestate succession, joint estate, Legal Costs, legal remedy, lobola, matrimonial property, patrimonial rights, Peteke v Khumalo, recognition of marriage, Rule 6(12), section 13, South African Family Law, testamentary rights, Urgent Application, urgent interdict, ZAGPPHC 447 Customary Marriage Dispute Halts Estate Administration: Peteke v Khumalo and Others (2025-009348) [2025] ZAGPPHC 447 (6 May 2025). The Factual Matrix: Disputed Customary Marriage and Control Over the Deceased’s Estate In Peteke v Khumalo and Others (2025-009348) ZAGPPHC 447 (6 May 2025), the applicant approached the High Court… READ MORE
02/02/2024 Bertus Preller Appeal, Mootness, Procedure admissibility, appeals, appellate proceedings, civil union, Court Rulings, customary marriage, division of estate, finality in trials, hearsay evidence, Herbstein and Van Winsen, jurisprudence, Legal Framework, Legal precedents, legal principles, lobola, Marital Disputes, matrimonial benefits, matrimonial property, mootness doctrine, N B v T B, Narius Moloto v The Pan Africanist Congress Of Azania, new evidence, practical effect, South African Law, Superior Courts Act, ZAECMHC Navigating Marital Disputes and New Evidence in Appeals: Insights from N B v T B and Another. – N B v T B and Another (2669/2021; CA 81/2022) [2024] ZAECMHC 8 (30 January 2024), also cited as N.P.B v T.I.B and Another – Appeal (CA 81/2022) [2024] ZAECMHC 4 (30 January 2024). Introduction In the case of N B v T B and Another (2669/2021; CA 81/2022) ZAECMHC 8 (30 January 2024), the court was presented with an appeal against the decision… READ MORE