07/05/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Child Maintenance, Costs, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Procedure, Rule 43 094387/23, 2024, abuse of process, Arrear Maintenance, case law interpretation, contact arrangements, costs order, dismissal, divorce proceedings, expeditious decision, Family Advocate, financial position, Gauteng Division, High Court, inexpensive resolution, interim relief, just decision, lengthy affidavits, M.N v A.L.N, maintenance, Minor Children, Pretoria, Rule 43 Application, rule amendments, Rules Board, South African Law, status quo M.N v A.L.N (094387/23) [2024] ZAGPPHC 402 (22 April 2024): High Court Dismisses Lengthy Rule 43 Application as an Abuse of Process. Background of the Rule 43 Application In the case of M.N v A.L.N (094387/23) ZAGPPHC 402 (22 April 2024), the applicant launched a Rule 43 application on 27 November 2023,… READ MORE
11/04/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Costs, Divorce, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance abuse of court process, appetite for litigation, caution, clear cases, community of property, contribution, court order, Divorce, equal footing, expenses, finality, financial positions, inherent power, installments, insufficient means, interim relief, judicial officer, Legal Costs, litigation, loans, maintenance, marital regime, Pendente Lite, prima facie case, pursuit of truth, relocation, Rule 43 Application, Settlement, trust account High Court Rules on Maintenance and Legal Costs Contribution in Acrimonious Divorce Case. – H.K v C.K (15793/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 99 (10 April 2024). Background of the Parties and Their Marriage The parties in this case, H.K. (the applicant) and C.K. (the respondent), were married on 5 October 1996. At the time of their… READ MORE
26/02/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Antenuptial Contracts, Child Maintenance, Children, Costs, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance accrual system, Asset Division, best interests of children, child maintenance, Court Decisions, court ruling, Divorce, divorce litigation, Equality of Arms, equitable distribution, Family Court, Family Law, financial disparity, Financial Disputes, interim relief, Legal Costs, legal obligations, legal principles, Legal proceedings, Legal Representation, maintenance determination, marital breakdown, marital standard of living, matrimonial assets, Parental Responsibilities, Rule 43, South Africa, spousal maintenance, Uniform Rules of Court Deciphering Divorce: A Rule 43 Ruling on Maintenance and a Contribution to Legal Costs – M Q v V S (0221062023) 2024 ZAGPJHC 188 (23 February 2024). Introduction to the Application for Maintenance and Legal Contributions In this Rule 43 application the court was presented with an intricate application concerning the financial sustenance and legal cost contributions… READ MORE
17/02/2024 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Arrears, Contempt of Court, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43 child maintenance, child welfare, contempt of court, court authority, court judgments, court orders compliance, divorce disputes, divorce proceedings, enforcement of court orders, Family Court, Family Law, financial capacity, interim relief, legal advice, Legal Ethics, legal obligations, Legal proceedings, Legal Representation, legal sanctions, Legal Strategy, maintenance orders, matrimonial disputes, matrimonial litigation, non-compliance consequences, parental obligations, paternal grandparents, personal responsibility, Rule 43 Application, South African Law Contempt and Conduct in Divorce Disputes: Navigating the Thin Line Between Legal Obligations and Personal Responsibility. – J.S.H v M.S.H and Others (1308/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 42 (16 February 2024). Background and Proceedings Initiated The case of J.S.H v M.S.H and Others, heard in the Western Cape High Court on 26 January 2024, under the judgment of Adhikari AJ, arose… READ MORE
09/02/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance assessment of financial needs, clean hands doctrine, court discretion, disclosing financial information, divorce court orders, divorce financial obligations, divorce proceedings, equitable relief, financial deceit in divorce, financial disclosure, financial transparency, honesty in legal proceedings, inheritance disclosure, interim maintenance, interim relief, judicial fairness, legal costs in divorce, Legal Ethics, legal obligations in divorce, legal strategies in divorce, maintenance orders, Marital Assets, marital financial disputes, NZIWENI J, Rule 43 applications, savings disclosure, South African Family Law, spousal support, striking applications, transparency in divorce, Uniform Rules of Court Unlocking Fairness in Divorce: The Critical Role of Full Disclosure in Rule 43 Applications. – C.A v H.A (5578/2022) [2024] ZAWCHC 25 (6 February 2024). Introduction In the case of C.A vs. H.A, brought under Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules of Court, the applicant sought interim maintenance for herself while awaiting the finalisation of… READ MORE
02/02/2024 Bertus Preller Anti-Dissipation Interdicts, Divorce, Hiding Assets AB v JB [2016] ZASCA 93; 2016 (5) SA 211 (SCA), alternative remedies, anti-dissipation interdict, anti-dissipation interdicts, anti-dissipation interdicts in divorce cases, asset dissipation, asset management, asset protection, balance of convenience, Carmel Trading case, Carmel Trading Company Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services and Others (447/07) [2007] ZASCA 160; [2008] 2 All SA 125 (SCA); 2008 (2) SA 433 (SCA), Cases on dissipation of assets, concealing assets, Dissipation Interdict, divorce law evolution, divorce proceedings, equitable asset distribution, fair settlements, financial practices, Financial Settlements, financial transparency, interim relief, irreparable harm, judicial process, Knox D’Arcy case, Knox D’Arcy Limited v Jamieson [1996] ZASCA 58; 1996 (4) SA 348 (A), Langebrink v Langebrink 2017 JDR 1059 (GJ) and Gernetzky v Gernetzky [2007] JDR 0247 (E), Legal Framework, legal implications, Legal precedents, Legal Requirements, Mareva injunctions, Marital Assets, matrimonial law, Msunduzi Municipality case, Msunduzi Municipality v Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund 2007 (1) SA 142 (N), negotiation dynamics, prima facie right, RS v MS 2014(2) SA 511 GSJ, safeguarding assets, SR v DR and Another (2980/2007) [2022] ZAGPJHC 172 Safeguarding Marital Assets: The Crucial Role of Anti-Dissipation Interdicts in Divorce Proceedings. Understanding Anti-Dissipation Interdicts An anti-dissipation interdict is an order that prevents a person from disposing of or concealing assets during divorce proceedings. Unlike Mareva injunctions, which prevent a defendant from… READ MORE
21/11/2023 Bertus Preller Adversarial Legal System, Alimony, Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance Affidavit Analysis, Attorney Conduct, child maintenance, Condonation, Constitutional Challenges, Court Rulings, divorce proceedings, Family Law, financial disclosure, interim relief, Legal Ethics, Legal precedents, Legal Procedure, Litigation Tactics, maintenance pendente lite, Procedural Compliance, Prolixity in Affidavits, Rule 30 Challenge, Rule 43 Application, South African High Court Navigating the Complex Waters of Financial Disclosure in Rule 43 Applications and Legal Ethics: A Closer Look at a Landmark Ruling and the Conduct of the Respondent’s Attorney. I P v N P ; In re: N P v I P (16768/2023) ZAWCHC 170 (20 November 2023) Analysis of Rule 30 and Rule 43 Applications Overview of the… READ MORE
15/11/2023 Bertus Preller Alimony, Children, Costs, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Parental Rights, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance best interests principle, Child Custody, Children's Welfare, Court Orders, divorce litigation, divorce proceedings, equitable treatment, Family Law, financial disclosure, financial imbalances., financial transparency, interim relief, legal costs contribution, maintenance pendente lite, matrimonial property, new family law case, Parental Responsibilities, Rule 43 applications, South African Law, spousal support, temporary orders Avoiding Pitfalls: Key Lessons from a Rule 43 Divorce Showdown. SN v SR (2023/036122) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1335 (14 November 2023) Introduction and Background Marriage and Separation: The applicant and the respondent had been married since 25 August 2007, out of community of property with accrual. They had two minor children.… READ MORE