12/02/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Arrears, Children, Divorce, Maintenance, Muslim Marriages, Procedural Law, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance audi alteram partem, civil marriage, contempt of court, court discretion, COVID-19 impact, divorce proceedings, family law disputes, financial hardship, Gois v Van Zyl, High Court judgement, interim maintenance, legal advice, Legal Costs, legal principles, Legal Representation, maintenance obligations, MEC v Ikamva Architects, procedural missteps, R.A v F.A, rescission application, Rule 43(6) order, Rule 45A, Sharia Law, South African Family Law, Strime v Strime, suspension of maintenance orders, Uniform Rules of Court, Urgent Application, Whitfield v Van Aarde Understanding the Suspension of Maintenance Orders: Insights from – R.A v F.A (14491/2020; 14490/2020; 19594/2021) [2024] ZAWCHC 35 (9 February 2024) – LEKHULENI J. Maintenance Disputes: Navigating Rule 43(6) Orders In the significant legal decision of R.A v F.A, delivered on 9 February 2024 by Lekhuleni J in the Western Cape High Court, the… READ MORE
09/02/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Maintenance, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance assessment of financial needs, clean hands doctrine, court discretion, disclosing financial information, divorce court orders, divorce financial obligations, divorce proceedings, equitable relief, financial deceit in divorce, financial disclosure, financial transparency, honesty in legal proceedings, inheritance disclosure, interim maintenance, interim relief, judicial fairness, legal costs in divorce, Legal Ethics, legal obligations in divorce, legal strategies in divorce, maintenance orders, Marital Assets, marital financial disputes, NZIWENI J, Rule 43 applications, savings disclosure, South African Family Law, spousal support, striking applications, transparency in divorce, Uniform Rules of Court Unlocking Fairness in Divorce: The Critical Role of Full Disclosure in Rule 43 Applications. – C.A v H.A (5578/2022) [2024] ZAWCHC 25 (6 February 2024). Introduction In the case of C.A vs. H.A, brought under Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules of Court, the applicant sought interim maintenance for herself while awaiting the finalisation of… READ MORE
05/02/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Children, Costs, Divorce, Parental Rights, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance bonding therapy, child best interests, child care, Child Custody, Children's Welfare, contact arrangements, contribution to costs, court order, court rulings Rule 43, divorce proceedings, Family Court, family dynamics, Family Law, family law analysis, family law disputes, financial responsibilities, forensic assessment, interim maintenance, judicial fairness, Legal Analysis, legal contributions, Legal Costs, Legal proceedings, legal strategies, maintenance contribution, Parental Responsibilities, Parental Rights, primary residence, South African Family Law, T E v V E, Von Ludwig AJ Navigating Family Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Rule 43 Application. – T E v V E (2023/021747) [2024] ZAGPJHC 94 (2 February 2024). Introduction: The Complexity of Rule 43 Applications Rule 43 applications serve as a pivotal yet challenging facet of divorce proceedings, offering a singular affidavit to each litigant to encapsulate a… READ MORE
27/01/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Children, Costs, Maintenance, Parental Rights, Rule 43, Rule 43 Cost Contributions, Spousal Maintenance acrimonious divorce, Asset Division, Child Custody, child maintenance, children's act, Constitutional Rights, court judgment, Divorce, divorce litigation, divorce settlement, Family Advocate, Family Court, Family Law, family trust, financial dependence, financial disclosure, interim maintenance, Legal Costs, Legal Fees, Legal Representation, marital property, marital regime, matrimonial disputes, Mediation, Rule 43, Separation, South Africa, spousal support, Uniform Rules of Court Unravelling the Tangles of Divorce: A South African Rule 43 – Case Study on Interim Maintenance and Legal Costs – T.C v B.C (21300/2022) [2024] ZAGPJHC 48 (25 January 2024). Background In this case, presided over by Mahomed AJ, an application was made for interim maintenance and a contribution toward legal costs, in line with Rule 43 of the Uniform… READ MORE
22/01/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Rule 43 business interests, complete disclosure, complex finances, concealed assets, cost contribution, divorce proceedings, divorce scenario, equitable contributions, fair cost-sharing, financial disclosure, Financial Disputes, financial independence, financial non-disclosure, financial positions, financial stability, financial support, gender disparities, gender realities, Legal Costs, Legal precedents, Legal Representation, litigation expenses, litigation strategies, Marumoagae AJ judgment, Material change in circumstances, matrimonial litigation, Rule 43(6), South African Family Law, wealthier spouse Rule 43(6), Cost Contribution, and the Perils of Financial Non-Disclosure in South African Matrimonial Litigation. – G, Z v G, J.G.C (77979/2018) [2024] ZAGPPHC 7 (12 January 2024). Introduction In this intricate and legally significant judgment Marumoagae AJ presided over a Rule 43(6) application that illuminated key aspects of South African family law, particularly in the context of… READ MORE
19/01/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance adventure hobbies, biokineticist mother, Child Custody, Constitutional Rights, divorce financial equity new case, Divorce Law, engineer father, equitable support, fair legal costs, Family court rulings, family law insights, family law precedent, financial disclosures, financial disparity, gender-neutral support, interim maintenance, K.A.E v W.N.E, legal advocacy, Legal Costs, legal expense allocation, Legal Representation, MAHOMED AJ ruling, matrimonial home, mother living with parents, new case analysis, new Rule 43 judgement, parenting plan, Rule 43, South African Family Law, spousal maintenance, spousal support Redefining Fairness: New Case Analysis on Spousal Support Where Mother Lived with Parents, Rule 43. – K.A.E v W.N.E (58415/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1488 (18 December 2023). Facts of the Case Background and Parties Marriage and Separation: The parties, K.A.E (applicant) and W.N.E (respondent), were married in 2010 and separated in 2017, a year after the birth… READ MORE
06/01/2024 Bertus Preller Alimony, Arrears, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance child support, court ruling, divorce settlements, Family Law, family responsibilities, Financial Obligations, High Court, judicial decisions, legal enforcement, legal implications, Legal precedents, maintenance compliance, maintenance orders, Marital Disputes, new case law, pension fund attachment, retirement annuity, South Africa, spousal support, unpaid maintenance Failure to Pay Maintenance Leads to Retirement Annuity Attachment: A South African High Court Ruling. MO v RO AND ANOTHER – Case Number: 15617/2022 – 5 January 2024. Case Overview In a recently concluded application in the High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division, Cape Town), with case number 15617/2022, MO (the applicant) brought an urgent application… READ MORE
03/12/2023 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43, Spousal Maintenance attorney divorce, child support, contribution to costs rule 43, divorce proceedings, divorce settlement, equal representation, Family Court, Family Law, financial dependency, financial disparity, Financial Obligations, forensic accountant, gendered maintenance system, interim maintenance, Judicial Discretion, Legal Costs, legal fees contribution, Legal Representation, maintenance claims., marital standard of living, matrimonial litigation, Ozzy Osbourne reference, Rule 43 proceedings, South African divorce, spousal maintenance, urgent applications Legal Drama Meets Rock ‘n’ Roll: PILLAY AJ’s Ruling against Attorney/Respondent in a Rule 43 application with an Ozzy Osbourne Twist – J K v E K (15912/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 182 (29 November 2023) Background of the Case Marriage and Separation Details: The parties were married on 1 December 2012, with their marriage being out of community of property and incorporating the accrual system.… READ MORE
29/11/2023 Bertus Preller Accrual Calculation, Alimony, Costs, Divorce, Financial Disclosure, International Divorce, International Divorce, Spousal Maintenance Cross-Border Complexities in High-Net-Worth Divorce: An In-Depth International Case Study from South Africa. – AG v YG (3932/2016) [2023] ZAWCHC 147. Introduction to the Case The case in question, a highly contentious divorce, began when the wife-initiated proceedings against her husband on 7 March 2016. After numerous interlocutory applications and delays,… READ MORE
24/11/2023 Bertus Preller Alimony, Divorce, Interim Maintenance, Maintenance, Rule 43 Adams J order, Alimony adjustment, child support, Court judgment analysis, divorce proceedings, Family court rulings, financial disclosure, financial transparency, Income reassessment, Legal financial examination, Legal financial scrutiny, legal precedent, Maintenance litigation, Maintenance order change, Maintenance reassessment, Material change in circumstances, Nkutha-Nkontwana J, Rule 43 variation, South African Family Law, spousal maintenance Navigating Financial Disclosure: The Turning Tide in Maintenance Variation Cases – Rule 43(6) – B.W.H v S.A.H (22802/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1348 (21 November 2023). Facts of the Case In this intricate legal matter, a husband (the applicant) sought a retrospective variation of a maintenance order previously issued by Adams J under Rule 43 of… READ MORE